Common Genetic Variants and Modification of Penetrance of BRCA2-Associated Breast Cancer

Abstract

The considerable uncertainty regarding cancer risks associated with inherited mutations of BRCA2 is due to unknown factors. To investigate whether common genetic variants modify penetrance for BRCA2 mutation carriers, we undertook a two-staged genome-wide association study in BRCA2 mutation carriers. In stage 1 using the Affymetrix 6.0 platform, 592,163 filtered SNPs genotyped were available on 899 young (<40 years) affected and 804 unaffected carriers of European ancestry. Associations were evaluated using a survival-based score test adjusted for familial correlations and stratified by country of the study and BRCA2*6174delT mutation status. The genomic inflation factor (λ) was 1.011. The stage 1 association analysis revealed multiple variants associated with breast cancer risk: 3 SNPs had p-values<10−5 and 39 SNPs had p-values<10−4. These variants included several previously associated with sporadic breast cancer risk and two novel loci on chromosome 20 (rs311499) and chromosome 10 (rs16917302). The chromosome 10 locus was in ZNF365, which contains another variant that has recently been associated with breast cancer in an independent study of unselected cases. In stage 2, the top 85 loci from stage 1 were genotyped in 1,264 cases and 1,222 controls. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for stage 1 and 2 were combined and estimated using a retrospective likelihood approach, stratified by country of residence and the most common mutation, BRCA2*6174delT. The combined per allele HR of the minor allele for the novel loci rs16917302 was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66–0.86, ) and for rs311499 was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61–0.85, ). FGFR2 rs2981575 had the strongest association with breast cancer risk (per allele HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.18–1.39, ). These results indicate that SNPs that modify BRCA2 penetrance identified by an agnostic approach thus far are limited to variants that also modify risk of sporadic BRCA2 wild-type breast cancer.

New Insights into the Genetics ofin VivoInduction of Maternal Haploids, the Backbone of Doubled Haploid Technology in Maize

“…However, in the two CML populations not all individuals homozygous for the inducer allele at the flanking markers of qhir1 showed HIR . 0%, a phenomenon known as incomplete penetrance (e.g., Barret et al 2008;Eldar et al 2009;Gaudet et al 2010), while complete penetrance was observed in 1680-F 2 and 1680-F 3 . Yet, genotypes at the actual QTL position are unknown and denser marker coverage would be necessary to more conclusively infer about penetrance.…”

Genome wide association study identifies a novel putative mammographic density locus at 1q12‐q21

“…37 This is the first time this gene has been related with MD; however, OTUD7B gene is altered by amplification in the 7.9% of 482 human breast tumours cases analysed in the study of the Cancer Genome Atlas Network. In fact the role of the genetic variation in the ZNF365 gene, other zinc finger protein (365), in MD variability 12 and also in cancer susceptibility [38][39][40] has been previously described. The relation between genetic variants and MD has been studied by different groups finding significant associations with several inter and intragenic SNPs.…”

Small- and Large-Effect Quantitative Trait Locus Interactions Underlie Variation in Yeast Sporulation Efficiency

“…A QTL is a region of the genome containing an allelic difference that causes a change in phenotype. Many medically and agriculturally important traits exhibit complex genetic architecture, including phenotypes ranging from diabetes and cancer penetrance to meat quality and frost tolerance in crops (Glazier et al 2002;Heuven et al 2009;Dumont et al 2009;Gaudet et al 2010). QTL with relatively large effects are the easiest to identify and analyze, yet most QTL have small average effects on complex traits (Mackay 2001).…”