2018
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common idiosyncratic volatility and returns: From an investment horizon perspective

Abstract: “Idiosyncratic risk–return puzzle” is conflicting and confusing. It becomes more complex by the introduction of the common idiosyncratic volatility (CIV). We shed new light on the issue from the perspective of heterogeneity of investors with different investment horizons. We study the “CIV puzzle” with Chinese A‐Share market evidence and further contribute by employing the wavelet multiresolution analysis framework to decompose the overall CIV into timescales that refer to risks in different terms. We apply th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
(138 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“… See Friend and Blume (1970),Black et al (1972), andMerton and Scholes (1972). The low-beta anomaly is closely related to the low-vola(tility) anomaly and fits into the broadly observed low-risk anomaly: Irrespective of the applied risk measure, low-risk stocks seem to perform better than predicted while their high-risk counterparts perform worse; seeBlack (1972),Haugen and Heins (1975),Haugen and Baker (1991),Chan et al (1999),Jagannathan and Ma (2003),Ang et al (2006),Blitz and van Vliet (2007),Ang et al (2009),Baker et al (2011Baker et al ( ), (2014,Baker and Haugen (2012), Leote de Carvalho et al (2012),Blitz et al (2013),Stambaugh et al (2015),Bali et al (2017),Beveratos et al (2017), andYin et al (2019).243 SeeBanz (1981),Basu (1983),Rosenberg et al (1985),and Bhandari (1988).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“… See Friend and Blume (1970),Black et al (1972), andMerton and Scholes (1972). The low-beta anomaly is closely related to the low-vola(tility) anomaly and fits into the broadly observed low-risk anomaly: Irrespective of the applied risk measure, low-risk stocks seem to perform better than predicted while their high-risk counterparts perform worse; seeBlack (1972),Haugen and Heins (1975),Haugen and Baker (1991),Chan et al (1999),Jagannathan and Ma (2003),Ang et al (2006),Blitz and van Vliet (2007),Ang et al (2009),Baker et al (2011Baker et al ( ), (2014,Baker and Haugen (2012), Leote de Carvalho et al (2012),Blitz et al (2013),Stambaugh et al (2015),Bali et al (2017),Beveratos et al (2017), andYin et al (2019).243 SeeBanz (1981),Basu (1983),Rosenberg et al (1985),and Bhandari (1988).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%