2012
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.29.000711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common omissions and misconceptions of wave propagation in turbulence: discussion

Abstract: This review paper addresses typical mistakes and omissions that involve theoretical research and modeling of optical propagation through atmospheric turbulence. We discuss the disregard of some general properties of narrow-angle propagation in refractive random media, the careless use of simplified models of turbulence, and omissions in the calculations of the second moment of the propagating wave. We also review some misconceptions regarding short-exposure imaging, propagation of polarized waves, and calculat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are situations when there is an optimal distance between receivers that minimizes the probability of fade. We believe that this is related to the essential presence of the negative covariance of irradiance imposed by the energy conservation [16]. Overall impression is that there is no gain in making separation larger than 5 C r .…”
Section: Scintillations After Turbulent Phase Screenmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There are situations when there is an optimal distance between receivers that minimizes the probability of fade. We believe that this is related to the essential presence of the negative covariance of irradiance imposed by the energy conservation [16]. Overall impression is that there is no gain in making separation larger than 5 C r .…”
Section: Scintillations After Turbulent Phase Screenmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Considering the uncertainty in comparison of the propagation results for different spectral models recently discussed in 13,14 , this seems a reasonable choice. While by no means universal, this normalization circumvents the dependence of results on the choice of the unit of length discussed in 13,14 . However, a definition of the coherence radius that is different from Eq.…”
Section: Monte-carlo Model For the Deep Turbulence Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a modeling compromise was adopted based on Fried's quadratic correction to the long-exposure (LE) MTF. This approach was subsequently critiqued by Charnotskii [25][26][27][28] who argued its quadratic term would produce inaccurate results at high frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%