Advancing Culture of Living With Landslides 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Patterns Among Different Landslide Susceptibility Models of the Same Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the current study that the relatively excellent predictive performance and low uncertainty of the landslide susceptibility models established using multi-year landslide inventories verifies the advantage of using a combination of event-based inventories and confirms the previous study results. The relatively high predictive abilities of the landslide susceptibility models, built by the combination of different event-based landslide inventories, have been thought to be related to their bigger landslide sample size and the wider numerical range of rainfall parameters in the training sample [23,54,55], or to their lower concentration of landslides in areas with the same lithology and a lower collinearity between rainfall parameters and lithology [56,57].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Performance Of Event-based And Multi-year ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of the current study that the relatively excellent predictive performance and low uncertainty of the landslide susceptibility models established using multi-year landslide inventories verifies the advantage of using a combination of event-based inventories and confirms the previous study results. The relatively high predictive abilities of the landslide susceptibility models, built by the combination of different event-based landslide inventories, have been thought to be related to their bigger landslide sample size and the wider numerical range of rainfall parameters in the training sample [23,54,55], or to their lower concentration of landslides in areas with the same lithology and a lower collinearity between rainfall parameters and lithology [56,57].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Performance Of Event-based And Multi-year ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compared these landslide susceptibility maps, in order to analyze the correlations in the spatial distribution of susceptibility index between the multi-year PM ensemble model and other models. Rather than performing the mutual subtraction algorithm [6,[58][59][60] or the histogram matching method [55,56], we calculated the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to assess the degree of difference between the susceptibility maps of the optimal model and other models. As shown in Table 13, the correlation coefficient of the single models ranged from 0.811 to 0.946, with an average of 0.912, which was lower than the 0.940-1.00 correlation coefficient range of the ensemble models.…”
Section: Correlations Between the Susceptibility Maps Of The Optimal ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrological models employ infiltration models to determine the critical rainfall triggering landslides, which requires the estimation and validation of soil parameters over large areas, and therefore makes these models impractical for regional-scale applications. The approaches based on exceedance probability can be further subdivided into two types, where the first type employs a landslide inventory induced by a single rainfall event and rainfall data for that event to analyze the return period of the landslide event [8,23,24], and the second type employs a long-term landslide inventory to calculate the exceedance probability for the occurrence of landslides. Concerning the latter type, the Poisson probability model [17,[25][26][27][28][29], binomial probability model, and empirical model [20] are commonly used to analyze the recurrence probability of landslide events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%