2010
DOI: 10.1080/00940771.2010.11461741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Planning Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The last decade has seen growing numbers of schools institute structured collaboration as an organizational routine-a "repetitive, recognizable, pattern of interdependent actions, involving multiple actors" (Feldman & Pentland, 2003, p. 95). For example, many middle and high schools have implemented common planning for content area or interdisciplinary grade-level teams as an attempt to displace traditional routines that treat teaching as work to be done in isolation and that perpetuate wide variability in instructional quality across classrooms (Mertens, Flowers, Anfara, & Caskey, 2010). Because they link formal structure with human action, such collaborative routines are said to have the potential to unlock "critical social technology" that has been historically underutilized in schools (Mertens et al, 2010).…”
Section: Structured Collaboration As An Organizational Routinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The last decade has seen growing numbers of schools institute structured collaboration as an organizational routine-a "repetitive, recognizable, pattern of interdependent actions, involving multiple actors" (Feldman & Pentland, 2003, p. 95). For example, many middle and high schools have implemented common planning for content area or interdisciplinary grade-level teams as an attempt to displace traditional routines that treat teaching as work to be done in isolation and that perpetuate wide variability in instructional quality across classrooms (Mertens, Flowers, Anfara, & Caskey, 2010). Because they link formal structure with human action, such collaborative routines are said to have the potential to unlock "critical social technology" that has been historically underutilized in schools (Mertens et al, 2010).…”
Section: Structured Collaboration As An Organizational Routinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many middle and high schools have implemented common planning for content area or interdisciplinary grade-level teams as an attempt to displace traditional routines that treat teaching as work to be done in isolation and that perpetuate wide variability in instructional quality across classrooms (Mertens, Flowers, Anfara, & Caskey, 2010). Because they link formal structure with human action, such collaborative routines are said to have the potential to unlock "critical social technology" that has been historically underutilized in schools (Mertens et al, 2010). Indeed, collaborative routines have ostensive (structural) aspects that define the "abstract, general idea of the routine" as well as performative (agentic) aspects, which are the "specific actions taken by specific people at specific times when engaged in the routine" (Feldman & Pentland, 2003, p. 95).…”
Section: Structured Collaboration As An Organizational Routinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous researchers have also participated in the National Middle Grades Project on Common Planning Time (Mertens, Flowers, Anfara, & Caskey, 2010) to explore common planning time using standardized protocols. In Phase I of the project, researchers observed team meetings and interviewed teachers to explore what transpired during common planning time meetings.…”
Section: Common Planning Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase I of the project was launched in November 2007. The project leaders developed the qualitative data collection instruments (i.e., the observation protocol and the teacher interview protocol) used in Phase I (Mertens, Anfara, Roney, & Caskey, 2007). The observation protocol is used to record attendance at the CPT meeting, teachers’ role on the team, the physical arrangement of the meeting space, use of an agenda to guide the meeting, duration of the meeting, and the specific activities/behaviors/topics that teachers engaged in during the meeting, as well as how long they engaged in each.…”
Section: The Cpt Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%