1992
DOI: 10.2307/2328950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Stock Offerings and Earnings Expectations: A Test of the Release of Unfavorable Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
80
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional studies have focused on financial variables other than announcement period returns to shed light on which of the hypotheses hold, but again the results have been mixed. Hansen and Crutchley (1990) document that abnormal earnings declines follow common stock offerings consistent with the cash flow signaling model while Brous (1992) and Jain (1992) report slight downward revisions in 1-year analysts' earnings forecasts following SEO announcements. Loughran and Ritter (1997) confirm significant declines in operating performance in the five years following SEOs with especially pronounced results for smaller firms.…”
Section: Information Signaling Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Additional studies have focused on financial variables other than announcement period returns to shed light on which of the hypotheses hold, but again the results have been mixed. Hansen and Crutchley (1990) document that abnormal earnings declines follow common stock offerings consistent with the cash flow signaling model while Brous (1992) and Jain (1992) report slight downward revisions in 1-year analysts' earnings forecasts following SEO announcements. Loughran and Ritter (1997) confirm significant declines in operating performance in the five years following SEOs with especially pronounced results for smaller firms.…”
Section: Information Signaling Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We estimate revisions of short-term earnings forecasts following the methodology of Brous (1992) and Grullon and Michaely (2004) and revisions of long-term earnings growth Table 1 Construction of sample. The final sample consists of 1670 new product introductions (NPIs) by firms listed on either the NYSE or AMEX between 1987 and 2009 that meet data requirements.…”
Section: Estimating Analyst Earnings Forecast Revisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brous (1992) shows that the forecast revisions as defined in Eq. (1) might be subject to an optimism bias.…”
Section: Short-term Analyst Earnings Forecast Revisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above simple revision of earnings forecasts could be a biased estimation of the true impact of splits, given that a monthly series of forecasts has problems of optimism and serial correlation bias (Brous, 1992). Accordingly, we calculate the abnormal or unexpected forecast revision as the difference between the actual forecast revision and the expected revision,…”
Section: Revision Of Analysts' Earnings Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where AFR i,t is the abnormal earnings forecast revision for share i published in month t, FR i,t is the actual (realized) forecast revision for share i in month t, and E(FR i,t ) is the expected forecast revision for firm i in month t, calculated with the expectations model proposed by Brous (1992) as,…”
Section: Revision Of Analysts' Earnings Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%