2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00559-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. an improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
401
0
16

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 730 publications
(420 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
401
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 Survival rates were referenced from the end of Re-RT and were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. 11 The difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves was assessed in a univariate manner with the log-rank test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Survival rates were referenced from the end of Re-RT and were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. 11 The difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves was assessed in a univariate manner with the log-rank test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients who received at least one cycle were evaluable for toxicity. Toxicity was evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0) [19].…”
Section: Baseline and Follow-up Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicities were evaluated with respect to incidence and severity using National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC, version 2.0) (Trotti et al, 2000).…”
Section: Response and Toxicity Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%