2002
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.71.2681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Window Resonance Features in K and Heavier Alkaline Atoms Rb and Cs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stark shifts are assumed zero because, as we have verified, they do not affect significantly the ionization signal. For the Fano parameter we have chosen three values: q = 1, q = 3, q = 6, which are close to the experimental values for LICS in sodium (q = 3.7) [17], helium (q = 0.73) [18], and hydrogen atoms (q = −5.9) [5], for electric-field mixing in rubidium (q = 3.3) [19], and for configuration mixing in potassium (q = 1) [20], rubidium (q = 0.1 − 0.3) [21], and cesium (q ≈ 0.43) [21]. Figure 5 shows contour plots of the ionization signal as a function of the center of the control pulse τ c and the peak control ionization rate Γ c0 for different values of the Fano parameter q and the irreversible loss rate Γ from state ψ 2 .…”
Section: Numerical Examplessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The Stark shifts are assumed zero because, as we have verified, they do not affect significantly the ionization signal. For the Fano parameter we have chosen three values: q = 1, q = 3, q = 6, which are close to the experimental values for LICS in sodium (q = 3.7) [17], helium (q = 0.73) [18], and hydrogen atoms (q = −5.9) [5], for electric-field mixing in rubidium (q = 3.3) [19], and for configuration mixing in potassium (q = 1) [20], rubidium (q = 0.1 − 0.3) [21], and cesium (q ≈ 0.43) [21]. Figure 5 shows contour plots of the ionization signal as a function of the center of the control pulse τ c and the peak control ionization rate Γ c0 for different values of the Fano parameter q and the irreversible loss rate Γ from state ψ 2 .…”
Section: Numerical Examplessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…4p photoexcitation spectral profile. The similar feature has been observed for several other systems [15,16,3]. The window type structure at 36.7 eV is assigned as of 4 P resonance, and the structure at 37.4 eV, of 2 P resonance.…”
Section: The Effect Of Spin-orbit Migration In Sub-valence Ion Core Osupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The charge-state resolved spectra were measured by gated collection of the photoion TOF counts. The apparatus is basically the same as that of our previous work, 17) and, therefore, its detailed description will not be repeated here. The details of the monochromator at BL-3B are described in refs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] In a previous paper, we reported the window resonances of heavier alkaline atoms K, 16) Rb, and Cs. 17) The window resonance of these species were found to be distinctively broader compared with their neighboring rare gas atoms. Also the window shapes were found to exhibit significant differences from those in the neighboring rare gas atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%