2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commonalities and Differences in the Transcriptional Response of the Model Fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Different Commercial Graphene Oxide Materials

Abstract: Graphene oxide has become a very appealing nanomaterial during the last years for many different applications, but its possible impact in different biological systems remains unclear. Here, an assessment to understand the toxicity of different commercial graphene oxide nanomaterials on the unicellular fungal model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae was performed. For this task, an RNA purification protocol was optimized to avoid the high nucleic acid absorption capacity of graphene oxide. The developed protocol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colony forming units (CFUs) determination, a standard population quantification method, allowed to measure the potential viability reduction of yeast cells in the presence of NTX1 nanotubes. The exposure conditions were chosen based on those employed in previous research works, allowing a direct comparison of the obtained results with recent studies, were the unicellular fungus was exposed to nanomaterials from different families, such as graphene derivatives, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), or 2D boron nitride [ 19 , 22 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. As displayed in Figure 3 , after two hours, CFUs of S. cerevisiae exposed to both concentrations were similar to those shown by non-exposed cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Colony forming units (CFUs) determination, a standard population quantification method, allowed to measure the potential viability reduction of yeast cells in the presence of NTX1 nanotubes. The exposure conditions were chosen based on those employed in previous research works, allowing a direct comparison of the obtained results with recent studies, were the unicellular fungus was exposed to nanomaterials from different families, such as graphene derivatives, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), or 2D boron nitride [ 19 , 22 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. As displayed in Figure 3 , after two hours, CFUs of S. cerevisiae exposed to both concentrations were similar to those shown by non-exposed cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRE1 produces a cell-surface iron reductase whose overexpression is induced during iron and copper depletion and causes copper sensitivity. Interestingly, the overexpression of iron homeostasis genes in yeast has been reported several times upon exposure to carbon based nanoparticles, such as graphene nanoplatelets and graphene oxide [ 19 , 41 , 49 ], which have been associated to iron scarcity due to the chelating properties of the nanomaterials. In addition, IRC7, which codes for a cysteine desulphydrase, enabling growth on cysteine as a nitrogen source, is induced in nitrogen and copper limiting conditions [ 50 ], while the high-affinity glucose transporter HXT4 has been shown to be overexpressed in low levels of glucose [ 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most reports have investigated the antimicrobial effects of graphene in vitro [ 12 , 32 , 54 , 56 , 57 ]. To our knowledge, pathogen pathogenicity experiments on graphene’s antimicrobial effect in vivo have only been performed for Fusarium Head Blight and Plasmopara viticola [ 19 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%