Communal and student-centered

Woxland, Conrad; Cochran, Dory; Davis, Erin; Lundstrom, Kacy

doi:10.1108/rsr-03-2016-0023

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Collaborative learning was positively influenced by mobile technology for engineering students and theatre art students [27] [32]. Researchers have proposed various models to integrate different online pedagogy for effective online classrooms [28] [33]. Though e-learning has witnessed a considerable leap during and post-pandemic, quality has been an area of concern.…”

Section: Co-citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Intellectual Landscape of Mobile Technology and Higher Education Research

Panackal,

Sharma,

Rautela

2023

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology has become a crucial part of higher education. Higher education institutions have adapted to embrace technology-enabled classroom practices to meet the rising expectations of a varied student population while continually enhancing their learning experience. Mobile technology in higher education, in particular, has the opportunity to provide access to or improve education at a low cost with a less demanding infrastructure configuration. In the current study, the researchers aimed to better understand the intellectual landscape of mobile technology and higher education through bibliometric analysis of research articles published in the Scopus database. This research included a study of 277 papers published in Scopus-indexed peer-reviewed journals between 2006 and 2023. The citation network, co-citation analysis, and publication patterns were examined to discover influential work in this domain. Bibliometric analysis was used to identify the most notable journals, authors, nations, articles, and topics, followed by thoroughly examining the content of 277 papers in the identified clusters. The four major themes enumerated are—Rise of mobile learning, E-learning—the blended and collaborative way, Mobile Technologies in higher education, and Student Engagement in the times of mobile learning. The paper provides interesting insights into these emerging themes, the study will assist regulators, policymakers, and academic scholars in understanding the fundamentals of mobile technology and higher education and identifying pertinent topics for further research.

show abstract

Section: Co-citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Intellectual Landscape of Mobile Technology and Higher Education Research

Panackal,

Sharma,

Rautela

2023

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While none of the objectives are not as uncomplicated as they might seem (deepen knowledge but how, and what and how ordinary people actually learn when they are interacting with 3 D models?). In spite of claims of the capability of 3 D models to change archaeological thinking (e.g., Reilly 1991; Renfrew 1997) relatively little evidence has been published so far on how this happens in practice (Wilhelmson and Dell'Unto 2015). As Polig (2017) recently remarked, the full potential of 3 D technologies in archaeological information work is still to be investigatedmuch similarly to how others (e.g., Moser 2012;Smiles and Moser 2005) have underlined the need for a better understanding of the implications of archaeological illustration in general.…”

Section: A Brief History Of 3d Modeling In Archaeologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Monstrous hybridity of social information technologies: Through the lens of photorealism and non-photorealism in archaeological visualization

Huvila

2020

The Information Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The entanglement of social information technologies and their users unfolds as a problem if "wrong" users enmesh with "wrong" technologies. A long-standing debate on the merits of photorealism versus non-photorealism in archaeological visualization provides an educating example of such a "problematic" or in Haraway's words, monstrous social information technology. This article shows how a closer look at the perceived monstrosities of social information technologies can help us understand how people conceptualize information, technologies, and other people and their role in information interactions as they unfold as part of information work. It shows how a lifelike photorealistic visualization together with its spectator forms a cyborg, which is a monstrous runaway "object" when it drives with its own cultural force a programme that contradicts with other programmes considered important. The parallels in the critiques of archaeological visualizations and other informational cyborgs in information researchincluding search engines, information systems and servicessuggest usefulness of a monstrous perspective in the analysis of social information technologies in general.

show abstract

Trends in information behavior research, 2016–2022: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Huvila,

Gorichanaz

2024

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on how people look for and interact with information has a long history in the information field. The current literature has been repeatedly reviewed in earlier volumes of Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. In this review, we offer an overview of the research published in this area in the years 2016–2022 with a focus on the trends that have emerged in this period. We use the term “information behavior” as an umbrella for the research area interested in how people become informed and engage with information in diverse manners acknowledging that different researchers and subfields prefer other terms and frameworks, including information practices, information experience, and health information seeking, to name a few. We reviewed 1270 articles in the field published in the years 2016–2022 and identified seven emerging trends: The CoVID‐19 Pandemic, Diversity and Inclusion, Embodiment, Misinformation and Trust, Social Q&A Websites, Collaboration, and Information Creation. The reviewed literature and trends are discussed in relation to their significance for information, earlier review of information behavior research, and the long‐debated issue of theory‐driven versus atheoretical research in the field.

show abstract

Communal and student-centered

Cited by 7 publications

References 8 publications

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Intellectual Landscape of Mobile Technology and Higher Education Research

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Intellectual Landscape of Mobile Technology and Higher Education Research

Monstrous hybridity of social information technologies: Through the lens of photorealism and non-photorealism in archaeological visualization

Trends in information behavior research, 2016–2022: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About