1999
DOI: 10.1051/forest:19990708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communautés de sous-bois des peupleraies artificielles : relation entre phytomasse, richesse spécifque et perturbations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although intensively regulated for centuries, the riparian plant communities of the Garonne River still show high diversity, at least near the main channel (Tabacchi & Planty‐Tabacchi ). Despite a clear disconnection from the river channel, which disrupts the optimal biogeomorphic successional scheme of a riparian system, our results confirmed those of Laquerbe (, ), who observed high levels of plant diversity in the understory of actively managed poplar plantations, suggesting that human‐made disturbance could partially replace natural disturbance. However, at the time, the question of whether near‐natural riparian and artificial communities converge in the long term remained unresolved yet relevant from a conservation perspective, especially in regard to planning the progressive abandonment of crops that have become ecologically unsustainable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although intensively regulated for centuries, the riparian plant communities of the Garonne River still show high diversity, at least near the main channel (Tabacchi & Planty‐Tabacchi ). Despite a clear disconnection from the river channel, which disrupts the optimal biogeomorphic successional scheme of a riparian system, our results confirmed those of Laquerbe (, ), who observed high levels of plant diversity in the understory of actively managed poplar plantations, suggesting that human‐made disturbance could partially replace natural disturbance. However, at the time, the question of whether near‐natural riparian and artificial communities converge in the long term remained unresolved yet relevant from a conservation perspective, especially in regard to planning the progressive abandonment of crops that have become ecologically unsustainable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Active poplar plantations (hereafter, “active sites”) were plantations actively managed in long rotations (age of trees at harvest >15 years) with low poplar density (planted poles spaced 6–7 m). Fertilization was rarely applied and disking was performed from one to three times per year (decreasing as the plantation aged) and disappeared during the last few years preceding clearing (Laquerbe , ). Harvested poplar plantations “harvested sites” were once active plantations that had been harvested by clear‐cutting (confirmed by the presence of a grid of hybrid poplar stumps) and left to spontaneously recolonize vegetation (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Une étude récente [21] a montré que, l'observation de plantations très âgées (plus de 30 ans) et non entretenues depuis de plusieurs années, permet une augmentation de la richesse spécifique par l'apparition de nombreuses espèces de milieux plus stables, à durée de vie plus élevée.…”
Section: Herbacéesunclassified
“…While half of the species became established in less than a year, the remaining species may require a longer time to become established, emphasizing the importance of life strategies in determining plant assemblages. However, the opposite pattern has been reported for French poplar plantations [21,22,65]. On the other hand, higher species richness was observed in plantations where strip tillage had been carried out for site preparation in comparison with full-area ploughing [24].…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Types Of Poplar Plantationsmentioning
confidence: 74%