2021
DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2020.1866933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating about computational thinking: understanding affordances of portfolios for assessing high school students’ computational thinking and participation practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the results of clustering analysis, learners in Cluster 3 who had many irrelevant behaviors and fewer operations of the programming platform underperformed in the CT test, from which we can conclude that irrelevant behaviors or cognitive absence are one of the barriers to developing CT skills through programming. Consistent with prior research (Fields et al, 2021; Hwang et al, 2012), Cluster 5, which performed lower in CT had the least number of debugging behaviors, which suggested that students could benefit from continuous debugging and modification of codes. Without testing their codes and detecting bugs in the codes, learners can hardly develop CT skills through the problem-solving process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Based on the results of clustering analysis, learners in Cluster 3 who had many irrelevant behaviors and fewer operations of the programming platform underperformed in the CT test, from which we can conclude that irrelevant behaviors or cognitive absence are one of the barriers to developing CT skills through programming. Consistent with prior research (Fields et al, 2021; Hwang et al, 2012), Cluster 5, which performed lower in CT had the least number of debugging behaviors, which suggested that students could benefit from continuous debugging and modification of codes. Without testing their codes and detecting bugs in the codes, learners can hardly develop CT skills through the problem-solving process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…From this perspective, the integration of computer science into schools has two main objectives: to offer all students the possibility of accessing computer science and to improve the learning of subjects known as STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) [12] by making the contents more authentic and relevant [13] and helping students with learning to break down a task into simpler ones, formulating and testing hypotheses, exploring and investigating, relating knowledge and coming up with original ideas or solutions. Thus, at a global level, different educational administrations have echoed this need in an increasingly digital world and are integrating computational thinking in their classrooms [14][15][16] as another competence that students must acquire from early childhood and primary education [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] through to secondary education [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portfolios have been used for evaluation in various subjects and fields, while their formats and contents vary greatly, each with its own set of advantages for evaluating student learning. The "cumulative" portfolio, for example, focuses on putting together a series of completed projects [21]. For example, portfolios utilized in the engineering domain are more process-driven and reflective and frequently deal with the advancement of a single project [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%