2006
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating brand personality: Are the websites doing the talking for the top South African Business Schools?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
113
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The body of work in the academic literature concerning branding of higher education does seem to be limited, however (Hemsley-Brown and Oplatka, 2006;Waeraas and Solbakk, 2008) despite branding's rise up the strategic agenda for UK universities (Rolfe, 2003).Aspects of branding have been explored; the role of websites in university branding (Opoku, Abratt and Pitt 2006) the role of heritage (Bulotaite, 2003) the emergence of brand identities ( Lowrie, 2007), and harmonisation within brand architecture of universities (Hemsley-Brown and Goonawardana, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Review Branding In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The body of work in the academic literature concerning branding of higher education does seem to be limited, however (Hemsley-Brown and Oplatka, 2006;Waeraas and Solbakk, 2008) despite branding's rise up the strategic agenda for UK universities (Rolfe, 2003).Aspects of branding have been explored; the role of websites in university branding (Opoku, Abratt and Pitt 2006) the role of heritage (Bulotaite, 2003) the emergence of brand identities ( Lowrie, 2007), and harmonisation within brand architecture of universities (Hemsley-Brown and Goonawardana, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Review Branding In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With particular reference to branding, extant scholarship has, for instance, examined branding, visual identity and nomenclature (Opoku et al, 2006;Pitt et al, 2006), as well as students' identification with business schools, drawing on social identity theory (Balmer and Liao, 2007;Balmer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Corporate Brand Building Within Top Business Schools: What Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study based on South African business schools, competence emerged as the most communicated brand personality dimensions in the schools' websites while sophistication was the least communicated (Opoku, Abratt & Pitt, 2006). An investigation of brand strength, favorability and uniqueness on brand equity in Malaysia revealed that the effects of brand strength and favorability on brand equity were higher in private institutions while brand uniqueness was a strong predictor of brand equity for public institutions (Teh & Salleh, 2011).…”
Section: Business and Economic Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%