2003
DOI: 10.1177/0193945903254062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating End-of-Life Preferences

Abstract: The purpose of this survey was to explore how adults communicate their end-of-life preferences. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 119 community-dwelling adults who had previously engaged in conversations about their end-of-life preferences. Factors that made it easier to initiate the discussion included having personal experience with illness or death (24.4%), being straightforward (24.4%), or having someone else facilitate the discussion (11.8%). Most described vague end-of-life preferences such as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While some participants expressed their preference to have discussions with their family and perceived that their family members are to be the final decision-makers, others reported that such end-of-life discussions with their family members remain culturally inappropriate. This is in contrast to previous studies, which reported that people tend to prefer to discuss any issues related to end-of-life with family members rather than with health professionals (Kahana et al, 2004;McDonald et al, 2003;Salmond and David, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…While some participants expressed their preference to have discussions with their family and perceived that their family members are to be the final decision-makers, others reported that such end-of-life discussions with their family members remain culturally inappropriate. This is in contrast to previous studies, which reported that people tend to prefer to discuss any issues related to end-of-life with family members rather than with health professionals (Kahana et al, 2004;McDonald et al, 2003;Salmond and David, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…They also found that many patients prefer that surrogates have some leeway in following their advance directives. Other studies report that discussions regarding EOL care often do not include specific treatment preferences (Hines et al, 2001; McDonald et al, 2003) and may occur only in casual conversations (High & Turner, 1987). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When residents discuss the deaths of others, it is an opportune time to initiate discussion about EOL choices because this is a time when elders are open to discussing their own preferences. 9,13 However, residents in this study experienced minimal opportunities for discussing EOL healthcare choices. Most of their discussions had been about taking care of the practical preparations for end of life including financial and funeral planning, consistent with findings in the study by Malcomson and Bisbee.…”
Section: Differing Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…9,13 Analysis of focus group data from three different elder populations with ethnic and socioeconomic diversity revealed four categories of influence for their participation in advance care planning: concern for self; concern for others; expectations about how advance care planning would impact them; and their own anecdotes, stories, and experiences. 14 Additional factors that facilitate EOL discussion are a straightforward approach and having someone else initiate and facilitate the discussion.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation