2020
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1829980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating evidence about the environment’s role in obesity and support for government policies to tackle obesity: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract: Public support for many policies that tackle obesity by changing environments is low. This may reflect commonly held causal beliefs about obesity, namely that it is due to failures of self-control rather than environmental influences. Several studies have sought to increase public support by changing these and similar causal beliefs, with mixed results. The current review is the first systematic synthesis of these studies. Searches of PsycInfo, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Open Grey yielded 20 eligible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39,40 Reynolds et al (2020) has recently challenged these results, finding no change in support for policies when the environmental causes of obesity were communicated, 41 concluding in a metaanalysis that the different results could be due to insufficiently persuasive messages. 42 The 'nanny state' narrative by the food industry or in media may also be another contributor to how the public perceives regulatory measures. Although causation cannot be established, there is evidence that support for evidence-based alcohol policy in New South Wales decreased compared with many other Australian states following negative public discourse about government restrictions on alcohol availability in New South Wales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 Reynolds et al (2020) has recently challenged these results, finding no change in support for policies when the environmental causes of obesity were communicated, 41 concluding in a metaanalysis that the different results could be due to insufficiently persuasive messages. 42 The 'nanny state' narrative by the food industry or in media may also be another contributor to how the public perceives regulatory measures. Although causation cannot be established, there is evidence that support for evidence-based alcohol policy in New South Wales decreased compared with many other Australian states following negative public discourse about government restrictions on alcohol availability in New South Wales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 However, these studies have typically presented messages delivered either once or repeatedly over very short periods of time through singular mediums such as written passages, text messages or infographics, which may limit their potential impact on beliefs and attitudes about obesity and its causes, as well as the role and effectiveness of a range of policy options to improve healthy eating. 45 Recent Australian research indicates that exposure to carefully crafted video counter-advertisements exposing the intent and detrimental impact of industry marketing of harmful products (in this case alcohol) can bolster public support for policy to restrict such marketing. 46 Research has demonstrated that repeated waves of messaging delivered to populations through multiple mediums, such as a combination of TV, radio, print media, online and outdoor media, over long periods of time are effective at changing beliefs, attitudes and knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies testing the effect of messages to increase awareness of the environmental causes of obesity and support for obesity prevention policies have found, perhaps counter‐intuitively, that both beliefs and policy support are somewhat resistant to change even when presented with supporting evidence 45 . However, these studies have typically presented messages delivered either once or repeatedly over very short periods of time through singular mediums such as written passages, text messages or infographics, which may limit their potential impact on beliefs and attitudes about obesity and its causes, as well as the role and effectiveness of a range of policy options to improve healthy eating 45 . Recent Australian research indicates that exposure to carefully crafted video counter‐advertisements exposing the intent and detrimental impact of industry marketing of harmful products (in this case alcohol) can bolster public support for policy to restrict such marketing 46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%