2012
DOI: 10.1080/10986065.2012.682960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating Experience of 3D Space: Mathematical and Everyday Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is reasonable considering that mathematical discourse often draws upon everyday language in specialized ways for the purpose of establishing mathematical meanings (Pimm, 1987). However, the differences between everyday uses and specialized uses of particular terms are not always transparent from the perspective of students (Morgan & Alshwaikh, 2012). The students' use of "intersection" did not actually carry geometric meaning, as it was not semantically related to other geometric ideas or relationships.…”
Section: Considering Students' Discourse From a Social Semiotic Perspmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interpretation is reasonable considering that mathematical discourse often draws upon everyday language in specialized ways for the purpose of establishing mathematical meanings (Pimm, 1987). However, the differences between everyday uses and specialized uses of particular terms are not always transparent from the perspective of students (Morgan & Alshwaikh, 2012). The students' use of "intersection" did not actually carry geometric meaning, as it was not semantically related to other geometric ideas or relationships.…”
Section: Considering Students' Discourse From a Social Semiotic Perspmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is a difference here in whether area is a specific measurement, or whether area refers to a region. Unfamiliar semantic patterns can be compounded when words common in everyday language are used in discipline-specific ways (e.g., Morgan & Alshwaikh, 2012;Pimm, 1987).…”
Section: Thematic Analysis To Examine Students' Talkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional thinking and reasoning is considered to be difficult by learners (Adolphus, 2011). Therefore, recent studies have begun to evaluate students' reasoning about geometry and 3D shapes by using dynamic geometry environments (Akyuz, 2016;Morgan & Alshwaikh, 2012;Ng & Sinclair, 2015) as they allow interacting with and visualizing geometrical objects from different viewpoints. Various studies discuss students' understanding about 3D shapes, misconceptions and errors, and the ways for improving students' conceptual understanding of the context (Wright & Smith, 2017).…”
Section: Geometry and 3d Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim, Roth and Thom (2011) while contesting knowing as a mental process detached from the physical world identified claims that students' gestures support, co-emerge with, cope with and exhibit (embodied and abstract) knowledge of geometry. Morgan and Alshwaikh (2012) reported in an experimental teaching programme making use of a LOGO-like formal language for constructing 3D trajectories and figures in a computer micro-world, a system of similar gestures emerged from the teachers and students to represent different types of movement.…”
Section: Embodiment: Gestures and Classroom Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%