2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating on Twitter during a disaster: An analysis of tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
249
3
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
249
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, in contrast to the satellite-based inundation identification, flood-related tweets are not necessarily an indication of an ongoing flood at the same time and place as where the tweet was posted. Research has shown that less than 5% of the disaster related tweets during Typhoon Haiyan dealt with personal observations, whereas 40% reflected second-hand information (i.e., re-tweets, or tweets about news reports) [24]. Second, the heat maps are strongly biased towards urban areas, both those affected from floods and those outside of the flood plain.…”
Section: Rapid Flood Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First of all, in contrast to the satellite-based inundation identification, flood-related tweets are not necessarily an indication of an ongoing flood at the same time and place as where the tweet was posted. Research has shown that less than 5% of the disaster related tweets during Typhoon Haiyan dealt with personal observations, whereas 40% reflected second-hand information (i.e., re-tweets, or tweets about news reports) [24]. Second, the heat maps are strongly biased towards urban areas, both those affected from floods and those outside of the flood plain.…”
Section: Rapid Flood Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the metadata that comes with Twitter messages posted by a mobile device also include information on the geographical location of that device at the time of posting, this information is not used in this study. The first reason for this choice is the fact that the majority of tweets report second-hand information, i.e., they discuss events that do not happen at the location of the person publishing the tweet [24]. Second, even when a tweet refers to a first-hand observation, it is not obvious that this observation has happened at the same time and place of the sending of the tweet [30].…”
Section: Near-real-time Twitter Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations