Communicating Organizational Identity as Part of the Legitimation Process: A Case Study of Small Firms in an Emerging Field

Abstract

The purpose of this study is twofold: (a) to assess how small firms communicate their organizational identity (OI) as part of the legitimation process and (b) to explore communicated values as expressions of OI. Using nanotechnology as an emerging field context, the authors conducted interviews with managers from 23 small firms and analyzed the identity values expressed in company communication materials using computerized content analysis. The findings demonstrated a clear focus on gaining legitimacy by emphasizing social recognition and fitting in. Three paradoxes emerged as follows: being adaptable yet focused; being cutting edge yet traditional; and developing new products, yet ones that fit in with existing products. We propose that in addition to serving as expressions of firms’ OI, values can also drive the strategic communication of OI and may provide resolutions to these paradoxes. We introduce the term complex dynamic organizational identity to describe the way firms use multiple, fluid, and dynamic organizational identities as a component of strategic communication with stakeholders. We argue that firms should take a more active role in constructing a complex dynamic OI as a strategic approach to facing paradoxes and improving internal and external communication.

Phygital as a Lever for Value Propositions in Italian Cultural Tourism Startups

“…The modalities through which the phygital approach can manifest itself are different, such as augmented reality [18], mixed reality [19], and extended reality [20]. With respect to these actions, through which companies interact with their customer targets, it appears necessary to make the combination of these channels continuous, in order to guarantee the customer the best possible experience, and also to provide the company that provides these products or services with detailed information on the needs that are coming from outside [27]. Within this scenario, characterized by the immediacy of the response to the needs of the user community, companies are called upon to design their products and services using this mixed approach, which is aimed at preparing for new opportunities and predicting customer involvement, as reported [28].…”

Measurement model of the projected and perceived image through the organizational identity of the Volvo Ocean Race Brazil event

“…Organizational identity encompasses communication, design, culture, behavior, structure and strategy, all of which contribute to the organization's personality and image. It becomes the best strategy to present an organization to its stakeholders (Huang-Horowitz and Evans, 2020; Melewar and Karaosmanoglu, 2006). Within the context of tourism, identity is not an essentialist concept based on place and culture, but rather a constructed identity that is transmitted through image and embedded within tourism narratives (Ateljevic and Doorne, 2002; Besharov and Brickson, 2016).…”

The Moderating Impact of Organizational Identity Strength between Strategic Improvisation and Organizational Memory and Their Effects on Competitive Advantage

“…Organizational identity is perceived in individuals' cognitions [63,64] and linked to how they make sense of and respond to daily practices [65]. Previous studies demonstrated that organizational identity could affect organizational culture, communicative activity [66,67], and even firm strategy [68].…”