Communicating risk for issues that involve ‘uncertainty bias’: what can the Israeli case of water fluoridation teach us?

Abstract

Water fluoridation is a controversial issue in public health. Despite the uncertainty regarding its efficacy and safety, health officials continue to communicate it as 'unequivocally' safe and effective. Our focus is on how health officials and policy-makers in Israel frame the issue of water fluoridation in terms of certainty while promoting a mandatory fluoridation policy. According to van Asselt and Vos, the uncertainty paradox describes situations in which uncertainty is acknowledged, but the role of science is framed as providing certainty. Our study is an analysis of documents and media articles emphasizing the paradoxical language used by official representatives on the controversial topic of fluoridation. A central contribution of this study is that we coin the term 'uncertainty bias,' in which policy-makers do exactly what they accuse laypeople of doing, framing uncertainty in biased terms. We found that in order to establish mandatory regulation, health ministry officials expressed information in an unbalanced format, promoting the topic of fluoridation by framing it in exclusively positive terms. This study does not focus on the practice of water fluoridation per se, and is not intended to decide for or against it, but rather, to explore how the debate regarding it is communicated. Understanding this particular case can shed light on how other controversial topics are transformed into health policy that is characterized in equivocal terms.

Developing an integrated multilevel model of uncertainty in health care: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis

“…We demonstrated the applicability of the model in healthcare using the example of water fluoridation45 46 (table 3) and showcased how different uncertainties coexist in a particular situation that contains many layers of complexity.…”

Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter-Tactics

“…Censorship undermines public trust in authorities, especially if the information hidden and later on revealed might have cost human lives, such as during pandemics, which involve diseases, treatments and vaccines (Gesser-Edelsburg and Shir-Raz 2018 ). In addition, censorship and manipulation of information are inconsistent with the essence of science, since scientific inquiry requires discourse and vigorous debate.…”

Treatment of uncertainties for security-related design aspects of advanced reactors when using a risk-informed licensing approach

“…Consequently, any recommendations should take that dynamic quality into account. Gesser-Edelsburg and Shir-Raz [53] noted that a key issue is when multi-disciplinary stakeholders are discussing the topic and possess differing risk perceptions. If the committee has not reached consensus on risk severity, how can the risk be communicated and discussed accurately with others?…”