“…Further, while a lot has already been published on scientific temper, including essays, book chapters, research articles (and even a dedicated Journal of Scientific Temper being operational in India since 2013), the scope of most of these outputs have been restricted to the history of science in India [Chakraborty, Raman & Thirumal, 2020;Mahanti, 2013], the role of science and technology in India's post-colonial development [Arnold, 2013;Mahanti, 2016], or critiques of how scientific temper has been inadequately or wrongly deployed in social arenas like policy [Udgaonkar, 1980;Seager, 2015], education [Sharma, Akhter & Mir, 2020;Kumar, 2022], and the larger scientific enterprise of India [Prasad, 1982;Chadha, 2005]. There has been some limited discussion on scientific temper within science communication research, but here too it has been restricted to short notes [Chakraborty, Raman & Thirumal, 2020;Raza, 2015], or brief case studies within global comparative studies [Finlay et al, 2021;Schiele, Gascoigne & Schiele, 2021]. We, therefore, observe that there is little discussion and contextualisation available -especially for international audiences -for situating scientific temper within the broader global spectrum of science communication models and frameworks.…”