Communication-And-Resolution Programs: The Challenges And Lessons Learned From Six Early Adopters

Abstract

In communication-and-resolution programs (CRPs), health systems and liability insurers encourage the disclosure of unanticipated care outcomes to affected patients and proactively seek resolutions, including offering an apology, an explanation, and, where appropriate, reimbursement or compensation. Anecdotal reports from the University of Michigan Health System and other early adopters of CRPs suggest that these programs can substantially reduce liability costs and improve patient safety. But little is known about how these early programs achieved success. We studied six CRPs to identify the major challenges in and lessons learned from implementing these initiatives. The CRP participants we interviewed identified several factors that contributed to their programs' success, including the presence of a strong institutional champion, investing in building and marketing the program to skeptical clinicians, and making it clear that the results of such transformative change will take time. Many of the early CRP adopters we interviewed expressed support for broader experimentation with these programs even in settings that differ from their own, such as systems that do not own and control their liability insurer, and in states without strong tort reforms.

Patient Safety Culture and the Second Victim Phenomenon: Connecting Culture to Staff Distress in Nurses

“…40 The study adds to this knowledge base by revealing that nonpunitive cultures for errors and events help nurture environments for these changes to be successful.…”

Improving reconciliation following medical injury: a qualitative study of responses to patient safety incidents in New Zealand

“…The shortcomings of this approach have led healthcare institutions to develop alternatives, such as communication-and-resolution-programmes (CRPs), to meet patients' needs 1. Yet little is known about the range of patients' needs following patient safety incidents, and thus about how well healthcare institutions meet them 2–4…”

Legal and Policy Interventions to Improve Patient Safety

“…43 These programs promise open discussion with injured patients about what occurred in which an appropriate apology and an explanation of what is known about the cause are communicated, regardless of whether the injury is determined to have been caused by error. When the hospital (in collaboration with its insurer) determines the standard of care was not met, the programs proactively offer fair compensation without waiting for the patient to file a malpractice claim.…”