2000
DOI: 10.1515/nor-2017-0377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication Challenges in Connection with Catastrophes and States of Emergency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to crisis communication research, scholars studying the role of the media in crisis have foremost been preoccupied with the media's role in allocating responsibility in evaluating crisis management responses (Buus and Olsson, 2006;Coombs, 2004;Garnett and Kouzmin, 2007;Perko et al, 2012). In instances where scholars have paid attention to aspects that lie beyond responsibility framing, such as the media's tendency to prioritize entertainment over explanations, preferences for human interest stories and reliance on specific event-driven frames have been done from an information perspective related to how 'media logic' gives obscure knowledge about deeper structural causes (Fung et al, 2011;Miller and Goidel, 2009;Nohrstedt, 2000;Scanlon, 2007;Tracy, 2012). Hence, previous research in the field has produced interesting findings in regard to responsibility dynamics, yet there is a lack of research exploring the role of journalistic styles and standards in shaping the preconditions for political actors to deliver their strategic messages in times of crises.…”
Section: News Coverage Of Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to crisis communication research, scholars studying the role of the media in crisis have foremost been preoccupied with the media's role in allocating responsibility in evaluating crisis management responses (Buus and Olsson, 2006;Coombs, 2004;Garnett and Kouzmin, 2007;Perko et al, 2012). In instances where scholars have paid attention to aspects that lie beyond responsibility framing, such as the media's tendency to prioritize entertainment over explanations, preferences for human interest stories and reliance on specific event-driven frames have been done from an information perspective related to how 'media logic' gives obscure knowledge about deeper structural causes (Fung et al, 2011;Miller and Goidel, 2009;Nohrstedt, 2000;Scanlon, 2007;Tracy, 2012). Hence, previous research in the field has produced interesting findings in regard to responsibility dynamics, yet there is a lack of research exploring the role of journalistic styles and standards in shaping the preconditions for political actors to deliver their strategic messages in times of crises.…”
Section: News Coverage Of Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature on 'extraordinary events', there are several different concepts in circulation, such as 'what-a-story' (Tuchman 1973;Berkowitz 1992) 2 , 'holy-shit story' (Romano 1986), 'gee-whiz story' (Gans 2004: 156-157), 'crisis' (Nohrstedt 2000), and 'disaster' (Scanlon 2007;Quarentelli 2005). The pluralism of concepts is a problem in that it hampers efforts to build up more systematic knowledge about how news media cope with these non-routine events.…”
Section: Lack Of Concepts and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case because the reasons for examining news media in connection with extraordinary events differ. The literature on disasters/crises deals with how the media report on situations characterized as crisis events from a socio-political perspective (see, e.g., Nohrstedt 2000;Quarantelli 1996;1989;. However, these events might well be routine reporting for the media.…”
Section: Lack Of Concepts and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an emergency, the demand for information rises quickly and dramatically, as citizens and the news media turn to public authorities for information and advice (Nohrstedt 2000). Questions quickly multiply regarding the causes of the emergency, the level of danger to the public, and what can be done to avoid harm (Sly 2000).…”
Section: Evaluating Local Emergency Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%