Communication Development in Children Who Receive a Cochlear Implant by 12 Months of Age

Leigh, Jaime; Dettman, Shani; Dowell, Richard C.; Briggs, Robert

doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e3182814d2c

Cited by 203 publications

(188 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

156

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Specific behaviours may either be directly observed, reported by carers or elicited. The scale has been widely used in clinical practice and research focussing on the development of young children (Bairati et al, 2011;Leigh, Dettman, Dowell, & Briggs, 2013;Van Rie, Mupuala, & Dow, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mothers' perceptions of their premature infant's communication: A description of two cases

Pascoe¹,

Bissessur²,

Mayers³

2016

Health SA Gesondheid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mothers' perceptions of their premature infant's communication: A description of two cases

Pascoe¹,

Bissessur²,

Mayers³

2016

Health SA Gesondheid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With the recent emphasis on early access to sound through early implantation, late implantation is now defined as more than 12 months after diagnosis of hearing loss [81]. Early implantation during periods of optimal neural plasticity maximizes early auditory experience and leads to more ageappropriate speech and language skills [67,82,83], which may also increase the likelihood for mainstream education from earlier ages onwards. Likely contributing factors for this delay between diagnosis and implantation include funding constraints, lack of prompt referral to specialized CI services, parental barriers such as delayed/missed appointments, complex medical conditions, family indecision and geographical location [81,84,85].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictors of pediatric cochlear implantation outcomes in South Africa

Roux

Vinck

Butler

et al. 2016

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To identify and describe predictors of pediatric cochlear implantation outcomes in a South African population. Methods:A retrospective study of 301 pediatric CI recipients from five cochlear implant programs was conducted and cross-sectional outcome data were added at the time of data collection. Twenty potential prognostic factors were identified from the retrospective dataset, including biographical, cochlear implant (CI), family and risk factors. Multiple regression analyses was performed to identify predictor variables that influence outcomes in terms of auditory performance (CAP scores), speech production (SIR scores), communication mode and educational placement.Results: Although implanted children within this sample did not have equal opportunity to access a second implant, bilateral implantation was strongly predictive of better auditory performance and speech production scores, an oral mode of communication and mainstream education. NICU admittance/ prematurity were associated with poorer auditory performance and speech production scores, together with a higher probability for non-oral communication and non-mainstream education. The presence of one or more additional developmental 2 condition was predictive of poorer outcomes in terms of speech production and educational placement, while a delay between diagnosis and implantation of more than one year was also related to non-mainstream education. Ethnicities other than Caucasian were predictive of poorer auditory performance scores and a lower probability for mainstream education.Conclusion: An extensive range of prognostic indicators were identified for pediatric CI outcomes in South Africa. These predictive factors of better and poorer outcomes should guide pediatric CI services to promote optimal outcomes and assist professionals in providing evidence-based informational counselling.

show abstract

“…14,15,18 Outros relacionam a linguagem da criança utilizadora de implante coclear com a de outras crianças com surdez profunda não implantadas [19][20][21]26 ou comparam o desempenho actual da criança com o desempenho dos seus pares normo-ouvintes, com a mesma idade auditiva ou cronológica. 1,[22][23][24][25][26]28,29 Na análise do processo de desenvolvimento da linguagem são utilizados vários instrumentos de avaliação que permitem examinar o desempenho linguístico das crianças. 27,30 Em Portugal, são poucos os estudos que se debruçaram sobre este tema, sendo escassa a informação sobre os resultados da avaliação das competências linguísticas das crianças utilizadoras de implante coclear, em idade escolar.…”

unclassified

O Impacto do Implante Coclear na Linguagem Oral das Crianças com Surdez Congénita

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acta Med Port 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):442-447 RESUMOIntrodução: As crianças com surdez neurossensorial severa a profunda podem adquirir vocabulário e estruturas sintácticas para comunicarem pela linguagem oral, após implante coclear. Objectivo: Identificar as capacidades linguísticas em crianças, com implante coclear. Material e Métodos: Estudou-se a linguagem oral em 18 crianças, entre nove e 10 anos, com surdez neurossensorial profunda bilateral congénita, com implante coclear, avaliadas com a Grelha de Observação da Linguagem-Nível Escolar. As pontuações obtidas foram comparadas com as das crianças normo-ouvintes com igual idade auditiva. Resultados: As pontuações nas estruturas linguísticas estudadas, crianças implantadas vs. padrão das normo-ouvintes foram: fonologia 29, 44 ± 8,4 vs. 29,68 ± 5,90, p = 0,91; semântica 18,55 ± 8,89 vs. 19,20 ± 4,85, p = 0,76; morfossintaxe 21,89 ± 12,85 vs. 26,35 ± 10,36, p = 0,159. Nas provas da estrutura semântica, não se registaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas. Na morfossintaxe, a diferença foi estatisticamente significativa na derivação das palavras, 2,83 ± 2,81 vs. 4,65 ± 1,64, p = 0,014. Na fonologia, verificou-se diferença significativa, na prova de discriminação de pseudopalavras, 6,6 ± 2,8 vs. 8,37 ± 2,32, p = 0,023. Na segmentação silábica, as crianças implantadas tiveram uma pontuação significativamente superior ao padrão 8,56 ± 1,6 vs. 5,9 ± 1,58, p < 0,001. Discussão: A semelhança das pontuações obtidas pelas crianças com implante coclear em relação ao padrão nas componentes linguísticas estudadas, confirma que o implante coclear promove o desenvolvimento da linguagem verbal oral nas crianças com surdez congénita. Conclusão: As crianças implantadas obtiveram ganhos de linguagem similares às normo-ouvintes com igual idade auditiva. Palavras-chave: Acústica da Fala; Criança; Desenvolvimento da Linguagem; Implantes Coclears; Percepção da Fala; Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial. ABSTRACT Introduction:Children with severe to profound sensorineural deafness can acquire vocabulary and syntactic structures to communicate by oral language, after cochlear implant. Aim: Identify the linguistic skills of children with cochlear implant. Material and Methods: Eighteen children of both gender, between 9 and 10 years, with congenital bilateral deafness, using cochlear implant, were studied. The evaluation instrument used was Observation Chart of Language-School Level. The results were compared with standard of normal-hearing children with the same hearing age. Results:The scores registered in the linguistics structures studied, comparing implanted children and standard, was: phonology, 29.44 ± 8.4 vs. 29.68 ± 5.90, p = 0.91; semantics, 18.55 ± 8.89 vs. 19.20 ± 4.85, p = 0.76; morpho-syntax 21.89 ± 12.85 vs. 26.35 ± 10.36, p = 0.159. Regarding the tests of semantics, there was no significant difference. Concerning the tests of morpho-syntactic structure, the difference was significant in the derivation of words, 2.83 ± 2.81 vs. 4.65 ± 1.64, p = 0.014. In the phonology, a s...

show abstract

Communication Development in Children Who Receive a Cochlear Implant by 12 Months of Age

Cited by 203 publications

References 49 publications

Mothers' perceptions of their premature infant's communication: A description of two cases

Mothers' perceptions of their premature infant's communication: A description of two cases

Predictors of pediatric cochlear implantation outcomes in South Africa

O Impacto do Implante Coclear na Linguagem Oral das Crianças com Surdez Congénita

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About