2011
DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2010.523475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication in the Disciplines: Interpersonal Communication in Dietetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…( 57 ) argue different settings have different needs for collaboration and with power accounting for the different ways collaboration can occur in different contexts. Although interpersonal communication and collaboration is highlighted as important in dietetic practice ( 58 ) , the dietitian–client interaction is what dominates the research and dialogue around the emotional and relational elements of practice ( 9,59,60 ) . Therefore, quality CDM requires dietitians to develop interpersonal communication and social awareness capabilities that enable effective interactions with other health professionals that involve power imbalances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 57 ) argue different settings have different needs for collaboration and with power accounting for the different ways collaboration can occur in different contexts. Although interpersonal communication and collaboration is highlighted as important in dietetic practice ( 58 ) , the dietitian–client interaction is what dominates the research and dialogue around the emotional and relational elements of practice ( 9,59,60 ) . Therefore, quality CDM requires dietitians to develop interpersonal communication and social awareness capabilities that enable effective interactions with other health professionals that involve power imbalances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present investigation was conducted in the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition at a Midwestern research university. The study is part of a larger study in which I examined the connection of oral communication traditions and the food science discipline (for other results of the study, see Vrchota, 2011;2015a;2015b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiences of four decades have resulted in a tradition in the communication discipline that guides in integration efforts with other disciplines (see, for example, Cronin & Grice, 1993;Cronin, Grice, & Palmerton, 2000;Dannels, 2001: Dannels & Housley Gaffney, 2009Morreale, Shockley-Zalabak & Whitney, 1993;Steinfatt, 1986;Strohmeier, Novak, Stratton, & Leipzig, 1992;and Weiss, 1990). To date, studies of communication integrations are available for the disciplines of engineering (Dannels, 2002(Dannels, , 2003Dannels, Anson, Bullard, & Peretti, 2003;Darling, 2005;Darling & Dannels, 2003), design (Dannels, 2005;Dannels, Gaffney, & Martin, 2008;Dannels & Norris Martin, 2008;Housley Gaffney, 2015;Morton, 2006;Morton & O'Brien, 2005), public education (Smith, 2005), dietetics (Vrchota, 2011) and food science (Reitmeier & Vrchota, 2009;Vrchota, 2015a;Vrchota, 2015b).…”
Section: Tradition Of Communication Integrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical framework of CID is grounded on principles of disciplinary knowledge construction, the social construction of knowledge, and situated learning, when learning to communicate is seen as a context-driven activity (Dannels & Housley Gaffney, 2009). So far, studies using the CID theoretical framework have explored discipline-specific contexts and communication education in the technical sciences (Dannels, 2002; Darling, 2005), business studies (Cyphert, 2002), design (Dannels, 2005), dietetics (Vrchota, 2011), pharmacy (Hyvärinen, 2011), and medicine (Haber & Lingard, 2001; Lingard, Garwood, Schryer, & Spafford, 2003). Studies on the discipline-specific communication education in medicine have explored public speaking (Haber & Lingard, 2001) and case reports as a speaking context (Lingard et al, 2003).…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of the Communication Coursementioning
confidence: 99%