Local Theories of Argument 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003149026-88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicative Competence and Local Theories of Argumentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of town meeting allows for play to preserve the humanity of the community. Crable's (2006) consideration of character armor as a way to alleviate anxiety in interactions, Ivie's (2017) notion of contingent identities, and Sawyer's (2012) observation of identities' and social relations' fluidity all find a place in town meeting discourse, discourse within a particular locally constituted situation (Reijven & Townsend, 2021). Town meeting provides the space for contingent identities, based on the specific motion under deliberation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of town meeting allows for play to preserve the humanity of the community. Crable's (2006) consideration of character armor as a way to alleviate anxiety in interactions, Ivie's (2017) notion of contingent identities, and Sawyer's (2012) observation of identities' and social relations' fluidity all find a place in town meeting discourse, discourse within a particular locally constituted situation (Reijven & Townsend, 2021). Town meeting provides the space for contingent identities, based on the specific motion under deliberation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnography of Communication scholars thus treat observable units of communication as expressions of an a priori system of such symbols and meanings, or a culture (Philipsen, 1997). Culture as a presupposed entity is assumed to be intersubjective (Reijven & Townsend, 2021) – i.e., to exist as shared knowledge within the brains of participants in a given speech community. Anything an actor does or says can thus be interpreted as a display of their general capacity to (mis)use symbols in relation to norms.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%