Click on Democracy 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780429501548-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communities of Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large body of scholarship exploring the transformative potential of social platforms to complement or substitute deliberative forums supporting civic participation, particularly with respect to access to information, reciprocity of communication, and commercialization of online space (Malina, 2005; Papacharissi, 2002). This scholarship pays tribute to the Habermasian concept of the public sphere, identifying the internet with domains of social life where public opinion could be expressed and often praising digital communication as a force for democratization and deliberation (Davis et al, 2002). The underlying assumption was that social media would offer the public an accord—and perhaps more critically, a public record—of the decision-making process underpinning rational deliberation (Papacharissi, 2008).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of scholarship exploring the transformative potential of social platforms to complement or substitute deliberative forums supporting civic participation, particularly with respect to access to information, reciprocity of communication, and commercialization of online space (Malina, 2005; Papacharissi, 2002). This scholarship pays tribute to the Habermasian concept of the public sphere, identifying the internet with domains of social life where public opinion could be expressed and often praising digital communication as a force for democratization and deliberation (Davis et al, 2002). The underlying assumption was that social media would offer the public an accord—and perhaps more critically, a public record—of the decision-making process underpinning rational deliberation (Papacharissi, 2008).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%