2014
DOI: 10.1093/sw/swu008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communities Respond to Predatory Lending

Abstract: Low-income communities in the United States have faced a history of financial marginalization and exploitation, most evident today in the proliferation of predatory financial services, such as payday lending and check-cashing services. Ameliorating the negative effects of predatory lending has become increasingly important on the agenda of community development efforts and the field of social work. Through the use of case studies, this article describes three specific strategies that communities use to increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, clinicians may need to be sensitive to – and collectively advocate against – structuralized social inequities that contribute to the perpetuation of poverty and financial loss, despite clients’ best efforts to improve their financial circumstances (Manseau, 2014). At the individual level, discussion of these broader societal forces may help reduce clients’ inappropriate attribution of economic difficulties to personal failure (Harper and Rowe, 2014), and may stimulate initiative for community advocacy against economic marginalization (Caplan, 2014b). Clinicians may also need to overcome their own anxieties or cultural prohibitions against discussing money, in order to fully explore the role that financial issues play in the lives of their clients – beyond any assumptions made regarding the client’s income and financial competence (Trachtman, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, clinicians may need to be sensitive to – and collectively advocate against – structuralized social inequities that contribute to the perpetuation of poverty and financial loss, despite clients’ best efforts to improve their financial circumstances (Manseau, 2014). At the individual level, discussion of these broader societal forces may help reduce clients’ inappropriate attribution of economic difficulties to personal failure (Harper and Rowe, 2014), and may stimulate initiative for community advocacy against economic marginalization (Caplan, 2014b). Clinicians may also need to overcome their own anxieties or cultural prohibitions against discussing money, in order to fully explore the role that financial issues play in the lives of their clients – beyond any assumptions made regarding the client’s income and financial competence (Trachtman, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are different understandings of the ways in which AFS and "financial access" relate to each other. For example, despite the trend that seeks to define financially excluded people as those turning to AFS (see Islam and Simpson, 2018;Koku and Jagpal, 2015;Caplan, 2014), Birkenmaier and Fu (2018) assert that financial access and AFS use are not the inverse of one another, but two separate weakly and positively correlated concepts. The results of this work illustrate the complex relationship between these terms.…”
Section: Afs and Predatory Lending One Last Chance For Excluded People?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, this study was conducted using open source material, without the co-operation of the agency involved, and the study noted the lack of detail about the programme essential to public accountability. Ager Caplan’s (2014) description of community-based victim support programs and a litigation case also was extremely short on detail and, overall, she emphasised that there was a lack of evidence of success in these programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khattri and Kumar Singh, 2018). Ager Caplan’s (2014) account of a community-based group assisting potential victims to avoid predatory lending also involved “extending guardianship”. The additional idea in her study of ameliorating losses to victims through financial redress from offenders could be partially categorised in situational terms as “reducing rewards”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%