2011
DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community and household socioeconomic factors associated with pesticide-using, small farm household members' health: a multi-level, longitudinal analysis

Abstract: BackgroundLongitudinal studies using multi-level models to examine health inequalities in lower and middle income countries (LMICs) are rare. We explored socio-economic gradients in health among small farm members participating in a pesticide-related health and agriculture program in highland Ecuador.MethodsWe profiled 24 communities through key informant interviews, secondary data (percent of population with unsatisfied basic needs), and intervention implementation indicators. Pre (2005) and post (2007) surve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different pollutants have a tendency to cluster differently with important socioeconomic variables. Pesticides, for instance, are associated with a lower income 71. PFCs, which come from domestic utensils, are associated with the higher end of the income spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different pollutants have a tendency to cluster differently with important socioeconomic variables. Pesticides, for instance, are associated with a lower income 71. PFCs, which come from domestic utensils, are associated with the higher end of the income spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent CIP action-research projects broadened their scope to include both Peruvian farmers and a concurrent focus on nutrition ( Cole et al 2011a ). Outputs of this research programme explicitly target goals of health equity ( Cole et al 2011b ), as well as the empowerment of farm families, alliances with social movements and the promotion of food sovereignty ( Terán and Cole 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Model D, when the product term Application of good/very good IPM× Participation in organizations” was removed, the coefficient of association for the implementation of IPM practices good/very good decreased and the association was no longer significant (β=0.08, SE 0.15). Based on ‘QICu’ values and the existing literature, 27 29 model B was chosen for the stratified analysis according to the presence or absence of participation in organisations. To more closely examine these relationships, we stratified table 1 data on use of IPM by participation in organisations ( table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies provide some clues to understanding these findings in the context of population livelihoods. 23 27 29 Smallholder farming communities often perceive that IPM practices cause crops to become more susceptible to pests, whereas the application of pesticides (particularly those of high toxicity) ensures harvests and reduces production uncertainties. The use of pesticides guarantees the production of larger and apparently healthier products of competitive quality for consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation