2006
DOI: 10.1101/gr.5580606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community annotation: Procedures, protocols, and supporting tools: Table 1.

Abstract: Investigators at the Baylor College of Medicine Human Genome Sequencing Center (BCM–HGSC) and BeeBase organized a community-wide effort to manually annotate the honey bee (Apis mellifera) genome. Although various strategies for manual annotation have been used in the past, the value of dispersed community annotation has not yet been demonstrated. Here we make a case for the merit of dispersed community annotation. We present annotation procedures, standard protocols, and tools used for sequence analysis, data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most eucaryal metazoan genomes have been intensively curated (e.g. Arabidopsis thaliana [17] and Apis mellifera [18]), most microbial genomes have not. Microbial genome papers that do cite manual annotation typically provided no details of how it was performed [19].…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most eucaryal metazoan genomes have been intensively curated (e.g. Arabidopsis thaliana [17] and Apis mellifera [18]), most microbial genomes have not. Microbial genome papers that do cite manual annotation typically provided no details of how it was performed [19].…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bcm.tmc.edu/projects/honeybee) (Elsik et al, 2006; The Honey Bee Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2006). For mapping the respective ESTs to the genomic scaffolds of the honey bee genome (Amel 3.0), we used ARTEMIS (version 8.0) as a platform (Rutherford et al, 2000).…”
Section: Rda-adaptersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESTs shown in Table II are those that could be mapped to exons or putative UTRs of predicted genes. The table lists the corresponding genomic region (oriented or unoriented linkage group), the identifier (GB number) of the Official Gene Set of the honey bee (Elsik et al, 2006;The Honey Bee Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2006), as well as the number of ESTs that clustered to each predicted gene. The BLASTP results report best matches to Drosophila or human orthologs and their respective similarity scores.…”
Section: Representational Difference Analysis For Mucus Glands Of Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the six species of Hymenoptera analyzed here, the predicted genes of three annotated model genomes were utilized, including: Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera), Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera), and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera). These coding sequences were downloaded from the following resources: Flybase (The FlyBase Consortium, 2008;Tweedie et al, 2009), SilkDB (Beijing Genomics Institute, 2006Wang et al, 2005), and BeeBase (Elsik et al, 2006; The Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2008), respectively.…”
Section: Contig Assembly and Identification Of Orthologsmentioning
confidence: 99%