Community-Based Management: Under What Conditions Do Sámi Pastoralists Manage Pastures Sustainably?

Abstract

Community-based management (CBM) has been implemented in socio-ecological systems (SES) worldwide. CBM has also been the prevailing policy in Sámi pastoral SES in Norway, but the outcomes tend to vary extensively among resource groups (“siidas”). We asked why do some siidas self-organize to manage common pool resources sustainably and others do not? To answer this question we used a mixed methods approach. First, in the statistical analyses we analyzed the relationship between sustainability indicators and structural variables. We found that small winter pastures that are shared by few siidas were managed more sustainably than larger pastures. Seasonal siida stability, i.e., a low turnover of pastoralists working together throughout the year, and equality among herders, also contributed to more sustainable outcomes. Second, interviews were conducted in the five largest pastures to explain the relationships between the structural variables and sustainability. The pastoralists expressed a high level of agreement with respect to sustainable policies, but reported a low level of trust and cooperation among the siidas. The pastoralists requested siida tenures or clear rules and sanctioning mechanisms by an impartial authority rather than flexible organization or more autonomy for the siidas. The lack of nestedness in self-organization for managing pastures on larger scales, combined with the past economic policies, could explain why CBM is less sustainable on the largest winter pastures. We conclude that the scale mis-match between self-organization and the formal governance is a key condition for sustainability.

Climate adaptation, institutional change, and sustainable livelihoods of herder communities in northern Tibet

“…The recently emerged livestock production cooperatives belong to community-based resource management (CBRM), and more in-depth analyses about the performance of the new institutional arrangement are still needed. The studies about CBRM in other pastoral systems showed that CBRM can work and fail in sustainable governance of pastures under different conditions (Hausner et al 2012). In addition, market economy has created new opportunities for herders to diversify their livelihood sources.…”

Pasture–livestock dynamics with density‐dependent harvest and changing environment

“…In recent years, several socioecological studies have been published, following the line of thought of Ostrom (). In these studies, the focus is on nomadic herders incentives, the likelihood of cooperation among production units and conflicts between traditional pasture management systems and state administrative systems and policy (Hausner, Fauchald, & Jernsletten, ; Næss & Bårdsen, , ; Næss, Bårdsen, & Tveraa, ; Turi & Keskitalo, ; Tveraa, Stien, Brøseth, & Yoccoz, ; Ulvevadet & Hausner, ).…”

Smaller Saami Herding Groups Cooperate More in a Public Goods Experiment

“…Saami herders have reported that communication and reciprocal cooperation are strong on the summer pastures in Finnmark, but that trust is lacking on winter pastures (Hausner et al 2012). While this study focussed on cooperation within and between summer siidas, future work should investigate cooperative and competitive behaviours in winter siidas, where land tenure changes may create barriers to mobility and resource-access, and so potentially prove detrimental to a cooperative reindeer husbandry.…”