2018
DOI: 10.1111/jcap.12206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community‐based mealtime management for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A qualitative study of clinicians’ perspectives and experiences

Abstract: Findings highlight the perceived need for more formal training for clinicians undertaking mealtime management, and the positive impact this could potentially have on their practice. Clinicians' emotion regulation during intervention delivery was perceived to be important. There was a perceived need for greater adherence to protocols but an acceptance that flexibility was also required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies did not include one or more of the following details: sample size justification, validity of outcome measures, description of the intervention, contamination and cointervention avoided, and drop-out reporting [ 35 , 36 ]. Qualitative studies ( n = 4) [ 37 40 ] mostly met the quality appraisal criteria except for two studies [ 39 , 40 ] which did not report, or provided inadequate detail, for one or more of the following aspects: theoretical perspective, obtaining informed consent, identifying assumptions and biases of the researcher and reporting on the decision trail. Kells (2013) reported better outcomes in patients who received meal support compared to patients who did not receive meal support; however, it is unclear whether patient characteristics, severity of illness, length of diagnosis, and physical compromise were comparable to the intervention group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two studies did not include one or more of the following details: sample size justification, validity of outcome measures, description of the intervention, contamination and cointervention avoided, and drop-out reporting [ 35 , 36 ]. Qualitative studies ( n = 4) [ 37 40 ] mostly met the quality appraisal criteria except for two studies [ 39 , 40 ] which did not report, or provided inadequate detail, for one or more of the following aspects: theoretical perspective, obtaining informed consent, identifying assumptions and biases of the researcher and reporting on the decision trail. Kells (2013) reported better outcomes in patients who received meal support compared to patients who did not receive meal support; however, it is unclear whether patient characteristics, severity of illness, length of diagnosis, and physical compromise were comparable to the intervention group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of time of mealtimes varied from 30 min [ 34 , 37 , 38 ], to 60 min [ 10 ]. Supervised rest period immediately after the meal ranged from 15 to 60 min [ 10 , 15 , 38 , 39 ]. While it is common practice in eatig disorder treatments (e.g., CBT) to use graduated exposure to ‘fear-foods’ in ARFID and AN, none of the articles described implementing a graduated approach to meal supervision.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinicians often find managing mealtimes with young people experiencing an eating disorder challenging. It may provoke anxiety among staff, particularly if a young person becomes distressed (Watt & Dickens 2018). Furthermore, some mental health nurses, particularly those with less experience, may feel uncomfortable acting authoritatively when working with young people with an eating disorder and have less confidence in doing so (Ryu et al 2022;Zugai et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%