2023
DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2023.2173272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community-based natural resource management: an effective tool to reduce poverty and inequality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hu et al (2021) employed propensity score matching (PSM) and endogenous switching regression (ESR) models to investigate the poverty‐reduction effects of cooperatives. Khan et al (2023) used PSM model to examine the impact of community‐based natural resource management on poverty and inequality in Bangladesh. PSM generally compares only the two treatment groups of interest, namely, treatment and control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hu et al (2021) employed propensity score matching (PSM) and endogenous switching regression (ESR) models to investigate the poverty‐reduction effects of cooperatives. Khan et al (2023) used PSM model to examine the impact of community‐based natural resource management on poverty and inequality in Bangladesh. PSM generally compares only the two treatment groups of interest, namely, treatment and control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars have criticized such concept suggesting that participatory approaches are more likely to reinforce existing social inequalities instead of shifting power relationships (Cooke & Kothari 2001 ; Stone & Nyaupane 2014 ). Conversely, a wide range of empirical studies have documented the benefits of participation for conservation outcomes and equity (Gilmour 2016 ; Akhtaruzzaman et al 2023 ). In the SSF sector, local communities’ participation in fisheries management has increasingly been promoted by institutions (FAO 2015 ) and researchers (Cohen & Steenbergen 2015 ; Jentoft 2005 ; Jupiter et al 2014 ), gradually shifting the debate from a focus on the participatory approach itself to its implementation on the ground (Berkes & Nayak 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%