Community-based water law and water resource management reform in developing countries: rationale, contents and key messages.

Abstract

Water resources management reform in developing countries has tended to overlook community-based water laws, which govern self-help water development and management by large proportions, if not the majority, of citizens: rural, small-scale water users, including poor women and men. In an attempt to fill this gap, global experts on community-based water law and its interface with public sector intervention present a varied collection of empirical research findings in this volume. The present chapter introduces the rationale for the volume and its contents. It further identifies key messages emerging from the chapters on, first, the strengths and weaknesses of community-based water law and, second, the impact of water resources management reform on informal water users' access to water and its beneficial uses.Impacts vary from outright weakening of community-based arrangements and poverty aggravation or missing significant opportunities to better water resource management and improved well-being, also among poor women and men. The latter interventions combine the strengths of community-based water law with the strengths of the public sector. Together, these messages contribute to a new vision on the role of the state in water resources management that better matches the needs and potentials of water users in the informal water economies in developing countries.

Local organisation and gender in water management: a case study from the Kenya Highlands

“…Across Africa, it is increasingly recognised that both statutory and customary institutions shape water management, and that it is important to understand the contradictions and complementarities between statutory and customary institutions supported by different types of authority (van Koppen, 2007). Men's and women's divergent social positions lead to differences in water use, water rights and access to water (Zwarteveen and Meinzen-Dick, 2001).…”

Flows and Practices: Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in African Contexts

“…African nation-states tend to have plural, overlapping and competing formal and informal legal and customary systems, and most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are characterised by primarily informal water users' practices (Biswas 2004;Shah and Van Koppen 2005). There are also problems around participation, elite capture and the importance of local social, gender and power relations (Van Koppen et al 2007). Such unintended consequences of development interventions and discourses are not uncommon (cf.…”

Addressing conflict through collective action in natural resource management

“…While statutory law and the judicial institutions to back its application in practice have significant benefits that include the potential for bridging across widely disparate social groups within a society, including nonlocal and foreign actors, customary conflict resolution mechanisms offer distinct advantages as well (Van Koppen et al 2007;Meinzen-Dick and Pradhan 2002;Pradhan 2005). These include:…”

“…For example, this means mandating equity in access to local natural resource conflict resolution mechanisms with regards to ethnicity, caste, and gender (Van Koppen et al 2007). It also means monitoring and mitigating the risk that customary institutions legitimize resource capture by local elite, a problem that contributed to the emergence of broad social conflict, and ultimately the brutal civil war, in Sierra Leone (Unruh and Turray 2006;Fanthorpe 2001).…”