2009
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2009.166181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Collaborations for Farmworker Health in New York and Maine: Process Analysis of Two Successful Interventions

Abstract: ). Reprints can be ordered at http://www. ajph.org by clicking on the ''Reprints/Eprints'' link.This brief was accepted June 9, 2009. ContributorsJ. Samples, S. Ventura, V. Sanchez, and N. Shadbeh provided expertise on farmworker communities in Oregon and helped develop research instruments, interpret data, and write the article. E. A. Bergstad analyzed and interpreted the data and contributed to article writing and editing. S. A. Farquhar facilitated development and implementation of research instruments and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the summer of 2006, researchers implemented this intervention with a random selection of Orange County farms. While process evaluation results are presented elsewhere [Earle‐Richardson et al, ], the current analysis seeks to answer three questions related to the success of the intervention: (1) is the baseline prevalence of eye symptoms elevated (validating the choice of eye symptoms as a topic); (2) do farmworkers who use the intervention report fewer eye symptoms than control farmworkers at the end of 8 weeks; and (3) what subjective feedback do farmworkers provide about the intervention?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the summer of 2006, researchers implemented this intervention with a random selection of Orange County farms. While process evaluation results are presented elsewhere [Earle‐Richardson et al, ], the current analysis seeks to answer three questions related to the success of the intervention: (1) is the baseline prevalence of eye symptoms elevated (validating the choice of eye symptoms as a topic); (2) do farmworkers who use the intervention report fewer eye symptoms than control farmworkers at the end of 8 weeks; and (3) what subjective feedback do farmworkers provide about the intervention?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%