Abstract:This study offers important baseline data about the acceptability of differing restorative techniques and about the type of intervention that could bring about change in pattern of use by community dental officers in two large Trusts in Wales. If a postgraduate course in the use of stainless steel crowns is to meet dental officers' needs, it should address their concerns about the use of crowns.
“…On the other hand, it has been suggested that dentists' reluctance to use SSCs as part of their regular treatment may be linked to factors such as low financial remuneration or perceived difficulties in placing SSCs. 5,13,24 In line with these findings, 18% of stated limitations to use SSCs in our study were related to the limited financial reimbursement by the payment system.…”
Independent of the technique used, SSCs are considerably underutilized in the dental practice in Germany, although SSCs are well accepted by the universities, however, predominantly using the conventional approach.
“…On the other hand, it has been suggested that dentists' reluctance to use SSCs as part of their regular treatment may be linked to factors such as low financial remuneration or perceived difficulties in placing SSCs. 5,13,24 In line with these findings, 18% of stated limitations to use SSCs in our study were related to the limited financial reimbursement by the payment system.…”
Independent of the technique used, SSCs are considerably underutilized in the dental practice in Germany, although SSCs are well accepted by the universities, however, predominantly using the conventional approach.
“…Many primary care clinicians view undergraduate training (4) and guidelines (5) as unrealistic for implementation in primary dental care. Instead it would appear that their clinical practice is modified in light of patients’ views (6), cost‐effectiveness, aesthetic acceptability, level of cooperation of patients (5), and the needs and demography of the local population (4) rather than evidence of clinical effectiveness (7). Lack of training has been cited as reasons for failure to comply with guidelines (5), but training has not necessarily led to increased implementation of evidence‐based techniques (7).…”
Dentists wanted concise, timely evidence-based guidance to aid their management of patients. Further research needs to be undertaken to understand how to develop an evidence-based culture in primary dental care.
“…Given the longevity of SSCs 18 , a primary molar treated in this way is unlikely to need any further treatment until it exfoliates naturally. It has been suggested that postgraduate training packages, and in particular hands‐on training courses, may be the most effective way to encourage dental practitioners to re‐evaluate the restorative techniques they undertake and may increase the use of SSCs for the restoration of primary molar teeth 21 .…”
This revised Clinical Guideline in Paediatric Dentistry replaces the previously published sixth guideline (Fayle SA. Int J Paediatr Dent 1999; 9: 311-314). The process of guideline production began in 1994, resulting in first publication in 1997. Each guideline has been circulated widely for consultation to all UK consultants in paediatric dentistry, council members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD), and to people of related specialities recognized to have expertise in the subject. The final version of this guideline is produced from a combination of this input and thorough review of the published literature. The intention is to encourage improvement in clinical practice and to stimulate research and clinical audit in areas where scientific evidence is inadequate. Evidence underlying recommendations is scored according to the SIGN classification and guidelines should be read in this context. Further details regarding the process of paediatric dentistry guideline production in the UK is described in the Int J Paediatr Dent 1997; 7: 267-268.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.