Community detection in graphs

Abstract

The modern science of networks has brought significant advances to our understanding of complex systems. One of the most relevant features of graphs representing real systems is community structure, or clustering, i. e. the organization of vertices in clusters, with many edges joining vertices of the same cluster and comparatively few edges joining vertices of different clusters. Such clusters, or communities, can be considered as fairly independent compartments of a graph, playing a similar role like, e. g., the tissues or the organs in the human body. Detecting communities is of great importance in sociology, biology and computer science, disciplines where systems are often represented as graphs. This problem is very hard and not yet satisfactorily solved, despite the huge effort of a large interdisciplinary community of scientists working on it over the past few years. We will attempt a thorough exposition of the topic, from the definition of the main elements of the problem, to the presentation of most methods developed, with a special focus on techniques designed by statistical physicists, from the discussion of crucial issues like the significance of clustering and how methods should be tested and compared against each other, to the description of applications to real networks.

Making connections: exploring the centrality of posttraumatic stress symptoms and covariates after a terrorist attack

“…Armour, Műllerová, & Elhai, 2016), the network of posttraumatic stress symptoms may contain subnetworks with symptoms that are more tightly connected with each other than with other symptoms. These communities or clusters of symptoms may function as relatively independent modules of a network (Fortunato, 2010). Examining grouping of posttraumatic stress symptoms from a network perspective may shed light on whether and how subsets of symptoms can constitute functional entities that might correspond to specialized functional modules.…”

Extraction of force-chain network architecture in granular materials using community detection

“…Our method uses community detection, which is a form of clustering for networks [34,35]. In contrast to previous uses of community detection in particulate systems [29,36], our method incorporates a geographical null model to account for spatial embeddedness.…”

The curriculum prerequisite network: Modeling the curriculum as a complex system

“…By definition, a latent knowledge community is embedded within a larger independent knowledge community (connected component), and its borders need not coincide with administrative, departmental boundaries. Community detection in complex networks is a very active area of research since it is widely believed that such communities represent modules that perform separate but integrated tasks in the overall network [50]. The brain has many such modules where, for instance, neurons in the occipital lobe link mostly to other neurons within that lobe, but also integrate with other regions of the brain allowing the broader coordination and assimilation of vision [51][52][53].…”