2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.93.012303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community detection in networks with unequal groups

Abstract: Recently, a phase transition has been discovered in the network community detection problem below which no algorithm can tell which nodes belong to which communities with success any better than a random guess. This result has, however, so far been limited to the case where the communities have the same size or the same average degree. Here we consider the case where the sizes or average degrees are different. This asymmetry allows us to assign nodes to communities with better-thanrandom success by examining t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If communities have unequal sizes and the degree of vertices are correlated with the size of their communities, so that vertices have larger degree, the bigger their clusters, community detection becomes easier, as the degrees can be used as proxy for group membership. In this case, the nontrivial detectability limit disappears when there are four clusters or fewer, while it persists up to a given extent of group size inequality when there are more than four clusters (Zhang et al, 2016). Other types of block structure, like core-periphery, do not suffer from detectability issues .…”
Section: Detectabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If communities have unequal sizes and the degree of vertices are correlated with the size of their communities, so that vertices have larger degree, the bigger their clusters, community detection becomes easier, as the degrees can be used as proxy for group membership. In this case, the nontrivial detectability limit disappears when there are four clusters or fewer, while it persists up to a given extent of group size inequality when there are more than four clusters (Zhang et al, 2016). Other types of block structure, like core-periphery, do not suffer from detectability issues .…”
Section: Detectabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…LFR benchmark graphs are more complex models than the one studied in (Zhang et al, 2016) and it is not clear whether there is a non-trivial detectability limit, though it is unlikely, due to the big heterogeneity in the distribution of vertex degree and community size.…”
Section: Detectabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently an effort among network theorists to provide a more general framework for studying modular networks (Fortunato ), particularly using generalized community models (Newman & Peixoto ; Zhang et al . ). Such models, adapted to the population‐genetic context, may be used in the future to ask questions regarding the formation of complex modular structures through evolutionary dynamics, or about processes in modular habitat patch networks, such as spread of alleles or local adaptation.…”
Section: Addressing Evolutionary Dynamics In Discrete Habitats Using mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While the rather limited utilization of community procedures in molecular ecology has so far been mostly focused on revealing hierarchical structures in empirically sampled populations, theoretical studies aimed at understanding evolutionary dynamics in discrete habitat patches may benefit from adopting a network approach as well. There is currently an effort among network theorists to provide a more general framework for studying modular networks (Fortunato 2010), particularly using generalized community models (Newman & Peixoto 2015;Zhang et al 2016). Such models, adapted to the population-genetic context, may be used in the future to ask questions regarding the formation of complex modular structures through evolutionary dynamics, or about processes in modular habitat patch networks, such as spread of alleles or local adaptation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral marketing has the same objective, since locating the right community is the first step toward effective viral marketing. However, Most of existing methods perform community detection at random basis [53]. In this section, a review of existing community detection methods and models that have been applied to online social networks will be presented to emphasize the importance and current lack of applying community detection to viral marketing.…”
Section: ) Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%