Community Dialogue to Shift Social Norms and Enable Family Planning: An Evaluation of the Family Planning Results Initiative in Kenya

Abstract

IntroductionUse of family planning (FP) is powerfully shaped by social and gender norms, including the perceived acceptability of FP and gender roles that limit women’s autonomy and restrict communication and decision-making between men and women. This study evaluated an intervention that catalyzed ongoing community dialogues about gender and FP in Siaya county, Nyanza Province, Kenya. Specifically, we explored the changes in perceived acceptability of FP, gender norms and use of FP.MethodsWe used a mixed-method approach. Information on married men and women’s socio-demographic characteristics, pregnancy intentions, gender-related beliefs, FP knowledge, attitudes, and use were collected during county-representative, cross-sectional household surveys at baseline (2009; n11 = 650 women; n12 = 305 men) and endline (2012; n21 = 617 women; n22 = 317 men); exposure to the intervention was measured at endline. We assessed changes in FP use at endline vs. baseline, and fitted multivariate logistic regression models for FP use to examine its association with intervention exposure and explore other predictors of use at endline. In-depth, qualitative interviews with 10 couples at endline further explored enablers and barriers to FP use.ResultsAt baseline, 34.0% of women and 27.9% of men used a modern FP method compared to 51.2% and 52.2%, respectively, at endline (p<0.05). Exposure to FP dialogues was associated with 1.78 (95% CI: 1.20–2.63) times higher odds of using a modern FP method at endline for women, but this association was not significant for men. Women’s use of modern FP was significantly associated with higher spousal communication, control over own cash earnings, and FP self-efficacy. Men who reported high approval of FP were significantly more likely to use modern FP if reporting high approval of FP and more equitable gender beliefs. FP dialogues addressed persistent myths and misconceptions, normalized FP discussions, and increased its acceptability. Public examples of couples making joint FP decisions legitimized communication and decision-making with spouses about FP especially for men; women described partner support as key enabler of FP use.ConclusionsOur evaluation demonstrates that an intervention that catalyzes open dialogue about gender and FP can shift social norms, enable more equitable couple communication and decision-making and, ultimately, increase use of FP.

“We have this, with my husband, we live in harmony”: exploring the gendered decision-making matrix for malaria prevention and treatment in Nampula Province, Mozambique

“…The concept of the harmonious household was notable in Mozambique in early gender-related studies by the Center for Communication Programs [36]. It was also identified in other African settings, such as Kenya [37], which similarly coined the term and identified its importance in daily life and couple communication relating to family planning. In Senegal, this concept was named as defining the opposite end of the spectrum to gender-based violence [38].…”

Feasibility testing of a community dialogue approach for promoting the uptake of family planning and contraceptive services in Zambia

“…Participants mentioned that they learned more than they knew about family planning and contraception before the dialogue, a nding similar to Tesfaye in Ethiopia on curbing HIV using community dialogues who found that this was a key driver of implementation [13]. Adding to the evidence in Zambia on participatory interventions in family planning and contraception, this study suggests the feasibility of the Approach and the possibility of the success of such a complex-designed intervention in the Zambian context [2,20].…”

HIV risk behaviours among women who inject drugs in coastal Kenya: findings from secondary analysis of qualitative data

“…For example, strategies such as community conversations that focus on educating wider communities can provide a good ground for dismantling harmful gender norms which seemed to create expectations that only women are responsible for safer sex. Community conversations have been applied to transform reproductive health behaviours in the study context [60].…”