Community‐Driven Hypothesis Testing: A Solution for the Tragedy of the Anticommons

Abstract

Shared ownership of property and resources is a longstanding challenge throughout history that has been amplifying with the increasing development of industrial and postindustrial societies. Where governments, project planners, and commercial developers seek to develop new infrastructure, industrial projects, and various other land-and resource-intensive tasks, veto power shared by various local stakeholders can complicate or halt progress. Risk communication has been used as an attempt to address stakeholder concerns in these contexts, but has demonstrated shortcomings. These coordination failures between project planners and stakeholders can be described as a specific kind of social dilemma that we describe as the "tragedy of the anticommons." To overcome such dilemmas, we demonstrate how a two-step process can directly address public mistrust of project planners and public perceptions of limited decision-making authority. This approach is examined via two separate empirical field experiments in Portugal and Tunisia, where public resistance and anticommons problems threatened to derail emerging industrial projects. In both applications, an intervention is undertaken to address initial public resistance to such projects, where specific public stakeholders and project sponsors collectively engaged in a hypothesis-testing process to identify and assess human and environmental health risks associated with proposed industrial facilities. These field experiments indicate that a rigorous attempt to address public mistrust and perceptions of power imbalances and change the pay-off structure of the given dilemma may help overcome such anticommons problems in specific cases, and may potentially generate enthusiasm and support for such projects by local publics moving forward.

Digitalization in the system of methods of scientific knowledge

“…Undoubtedly, digitalization has a targeted practical orientation [5,[22][23][24][25][26]. The effectiveness of this procedure depends largely on the result of the selection operation, the comprehension of the data stream.…”

Public Participation In Protecting Food Resources: The Case Of Federal Lands In Pickering

“…NIMBY cases tend to happen frequently when potential property losses are involved, and they are occurring all over the world (Tang et al, 2005;Vanclay et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2017;Teo and Loosemore, 2017). The phenomenon usually holds a derogatory connotation, based on the perception that a smaller subset of the public is resisting a project that has the potential to generate larger public good (Palma-Oliveira et al, 2018), like wind farms or airport developments (Jami and Walsh, 2014;Vanclay et al, 2015). However, this labeling is not always helpful in developing effective project management strategies to engage with communities which often have genuine and justifiable development concerns (Teo and Loosemore, 2017).…”

A “solution-focused” comparative risk assessment of conventional and synthetic biology approaches to control mosquitoes carrying the dengue fever virus

“…By emphasizing the SFRA paradigm, this article attempts to break new ground in relation to both risk assessment and risk management, and does so by going beyond the simple, often dichotomous ways decision-makers and the public think about both analysis and action (see discussion of this dichotomy, and the policy problems it produces, in Palma-Oliveira et al (2017)). The risk assessment questions that society generally poses about technologies and products often start and end with "is it safe?"…”