Community Engagement and Public Events: The Case of Australian Folk Festivals

Abstract

The impact of public events on their host communities has been an area of increasing researcher focus over the past decade. While acknowledging this, little effort has been directed at identifying those practices purposefully employed by the organizers of such events for community engagement purposes. This exploratory study, undertaken in the Australian context, seeks to go some way towards addressing this gap in the literature by examining one type of public event—folk festivals—which anecdotally have a reputation for being proactive in the area of community engagement. The methodology for this study involved an extensive literature review, a series of in-depth interviews with senior managers of selected folk festivals (20), and an examination of secondary data sources relating to these same events. An analysis of this material resulted in the identification of a number of community engagement practices. These practices were grouped under three broad headings: transactional, transitional, or transformational. Additionally, a number of factors were identified as drivers for the adoption of these practices, while others were found to impact upon their use and/or effectiveness. It was also determined that a broad range of formal and informal community groups were embraced through the community engagement process. The significance of the findings from this study lie in their capacity to provide event organizers, both in the folk festival area and the broader public events field, with a deeper appreciation of the range of potential community engagement practices, along with key considerations in their use, as they seek to build a positive operational climate within their host communities.

Place-based community events and resistance to territorial stigmatisation

“…Many have demonstrated that place-based community events can play an active role in facilitating positive outcomes such as enhancing place identities, enabling intercultural encounters, building social capital and improving individual subjective well-being (Andrews and Leopold, 2013; Hassanli et al ., 2020, 2021; Jaeger and Mykletun, 2013; Jepson and Clarke, 2015a, b; Piazzi and Harris, 2016). However, events cannot address all the challenges faced by neighbourhoods or communities, especially those that are super-diverse and complex.…”

Networked Economic Value Creation in Event Tourism: An Exploratory Study of Towns and Smaller Cities in the UK

“…This study shifts the focus of economic value creation in events away from the major cities that are prevalent in the literature. Previously, the study of towns and smaller cities has been mainly limited to a case study approach (Moscardo, 2007;Piazzi & Harris, 2016). For example, Alves, Cerro, & Martins, (2010) demonstrated the importance and impacts of small rural tourism events and Fountain & Mackay, (2017) describe the role of a rural festival in placemaking for the small town of Akaroa in New Zealand.…”

Wackiness and Event Management: The Case of the World Alternative Games

“…These are especially important for rural events to take shape because there is not always ample or adequate supply across certain areas which might be taken-for-granted in cities (Ziakas & Boukas, 2016). Understanding all these aspects is something that challenges event managers in rural communities, because local residents tend to be deeply involved in the event organisation (Đurkin & Wise, 2018;Perić et al, 2016;Piazzi & Harris, 2016). Compared to major events, smaller events in rural areas may appear manageable given they do not require large investments, new infrastructures or involve complex relationships across different governance levels (Alves et al, 2010;Gibson et al, 2012).…”