Community engagement in health systems interventions and research in conflict-affected countries: a scoping review of approaches

Abstract

Background Healthcare research, planning, and delivery with minimal community engagement can result in financial wastage, failure to meet objectives, and frustration in the communities that programmes are designed to help. Engaging communities – individual service-users and user groups – in the planning, delivery, and assessment of healthcare initiatives from inception promotes transparency, accountability, and ‘ownership’. Health systems affected by conflict must try to ensure that interventions engage communities and do not exacerbate existing problems. Engaging communities in interventions and research on conflict-affected health systems is essential to begin addressing effects on service delivery and access. Objective This review aimed to identify and interrogate the literature on community engagement in health system interventions and research in conflict-affected settings. Methods We conducted a scoping review using Arksey & O’Malley’s framework, synthesising the data descriptively. Results We included 19 of 2,355 potential sources identified. Each discussed at least one aspect of community engagement, predominantly participatory methods, in 12 conflict-affected countries. Major lessons included the importance of engaging community and religious leaders, as well as people of lower socioeconomic status, in both designing and delivering culturally acceptable healthcare; mobilising community members and involving them in programme delivery to increase acceptability; mediating between governments, armed groups and other organisations to increase the ability of healthcare providers to remain in post; giving community members spaces for feedback on healthcare provision, to provide communities with evidence that programmes and initiatives are working. Conclusion Community engagement in identifying and setting priorities, decision-making, implementing, and evaluating potential solutions helps people share their views and encourages a sense of ownership and increases the likely success of healthcare interventions. However, engaging communities can be particularly difficult in conflict-affected settings, where priorities may not be easy to identify, and many other factors, such as safety, power relations, and entrenched inequalities, must be considered.

Using participatory action research to reimagine community mental health services in Colombia: a mixed-method study protocol

“…The value of these types of linking interventions for health systems improvement is well documented elsewhere. 32 …”

“…Crucially, our adaptation seeks to enhance links across groups that are historically opposed and limited by unequal access to power: community service providers, ex-combatants, internally displaced people and host community members. The value of these types of linking interventions for health systems improvement is well documented elsewhere 32…”

“…The value of these types of linking interventions for health systems improvement is well documented elsewhere. 32 Based on community priorities identified in the TOC process, the proposed outcomes for the PLA intervention are as follows. We organise these into primary outcomes which we feel may be achieved in the short term, as well as longer term outcomes that could occur with longer running of PLA groups:…”

Una ciudad amigable con las personas con demencia y sus cuidadores. Proyecto Vic: Cultura y Alzheimer

“…Las intervenciones tradicionales, sin cuestionar su parcial funcionalidad, no suelen estar centradas en la persona. Según Durrance-Bagale et al (2022) esto provoca: a) déficit financiero (no es costoefectiva), b) poca participación y transformación social, c) frustración entre la comunidad. Por el contrario, las intervenciones comunitarias tienden a aumentar el compromiso y la participación de las personas y aumentan la probabilidad de éxito (Gil-Girbau et al, 2021), la sostenibilidad, fomentando la transformación social y los derechos humanos; y empoderando la comunidad (Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados, 2008; Baradan et al, 2013).…”

Health system evaluation in conflict-affected countries: a scoping review of approaches and methods

“…However, efforts remain challenging and often insufficiently documented in the healthcare evaluation literature. The practical and ethical challenges involved in implementing research in these settings—constrained access to populations of concern, potential vulnerabilities, building trust, risks for researcher and participant integrity, and problematisation of local ethics approvals when governments are targeting civilians—can discourage robust research efforts [ 21 , 23 ].…”