Community Engagement Research and Dual Diagnosis Anonymous

Roush, Sean; Monica, Corbett; Pavlovich, Danny; Drake, Robert E.

doi:10.1080/15504263.2015.1025214

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…e476 | ADEBAYO Et Al. 2014;Roush, Monica, Pavlovich, & Drake, 2015). The problem with this is that not capturing CBOE early on in the research process can negatively influence a project or partnership (Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, 2011).…”

Section: What This Paper Addsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Literature suggests that CBOE may be a major predictor of outcomes in public health (Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, ; Patel et al., ). However, it is mostly acknowledged at the end of the research process, as opposed to earlier phases (Drake & Whitley, ; Roush, Monica, Pavlovich, & Drake, ). The problem with this is that not capturing CBOE early on in the research process can negatively influence a project or partnership (Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement

Adebayo

Salerno

Francillon

et al. 2018

Health Soc Care Community

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community-based organisations (CBOs) are important for eliminating health disparities globally and translating research findings to inform interventions. Engagement is an integral part of partnerships between CBOs and community health researchers and impacts the quality and quantity of any desired outcome. Despite the acknowledged benefits of community-based organisation engagement (CBOE), there are variations in its operationalisation and paucity in the understanding of its use in community-scientific partnerships. To further understand CBOE, the aim of this study was to synthesise published literature relevant to the definitions and applications of CBOE and identify its key components. A systematic search was conducted in March 2017, and updated in June 2017. Keywords were varied to account for international differences in spelling and word usage. Five major databases, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar, were used to identify potential research studies. A total of 32 studies were included in this review. Following the analysis of the literature, four salient themes emerged as components of CBOE: (1) Need (a consensus between all the parties in a partnership on the importance of a specified project and its proposed benefits to a target community); (2) Partnership Dynamics (the workings of a relationship between a CBO and a scientific/academic stakeholder); (3) Resources (include but are not limited to: personnel, money, work space, expertise and equipment); and (4) Outcomes (products of the partnership). This review provides a foundation for future research in applying CBOE to translational research and interventions. This analysis will assist community health researchers in planning partnerships with CBOs, and make necessary adjustments to improve study outcomes. Appropriate application of the components of CBOE in partnerships will assist researchers in addressing health disparities.

show abstract

Section: What This Paper Addsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement

Adebayo

Salerno

Francillon

et al. 2018

Health Soc Care Community

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Social connectedness, including peer support, recognizes that recovery is a joint venture with many helpers along the way (23)(24). For example, relationships with peers who do not use alcohol and other drugs facilitate recovery from substance use disorders (25).…”

Section: Qualitative Views: Service Users' Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring recovery as an outcome

Drake¹,

Noël²,

Deegan³

2015

Die Psychiatrie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Background: As the concept of recovery has become increasingly popular in mental health treatment settings, professionals have attempted to measure recovery as an outcome. Aims: This article reviews the history of the concept of recovery and recent attempts to measure recovery as an outcome. Results: The concept of recovery, as developed by people who experienced mental health problems, emphasizes the process of learning to live a meaningful life in spite of vulnerabilities and symptoms. Traditional outcome studies assess recovery as cure or return to premorbid functioning, not in this new sense of developing quality of life. Newer measures attempt to assess the process and outcomes of recovery, but with minimal consistency, reflecting the heterogeneity of definitions, populations, and programs. Attempts to measure recovery may, nevertheless, move the mental health system, programs, and professionals closer to understanding and honoring the ideals of recovery that are so meaningful to service users.

show abstract

Community Engagement Research and Dual Diagnosis Anonymous

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement

A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement

Measuring recovery as an outcome

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About