Community Forestry and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Two Way Street

Abstract

This paper analyses the contributions of community and smallholder forestry (CSF) to achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs). A CSF-SDG positive feedback model is proposed; a model that holds that successful CSF positively contributes to 13 SDGs and 31 SDG targets. Recent CSF meta-studies have scrutinized factors leading to CSF success and found some 10 factors and conditions that contribute to that objective. If efforts towards reaching the SDGs support or enhance these factors leading to the greater success of CSF, this in turn would boost CSF contributions to the SDGs and their targets. As a result, CSF or active support for CSF, focusing on the 10 CSF factors that favor success, can be linked to 48 unique SDG targets. The analysis suggests that there is a significant opportunity to explore win-win options for efforts to support CSF and contribute to SDGs, but also for efforts to pursue the SDGs and targets that favor CSF, which will in turn boost the contribution of CSF to the SDGs. The case of CSF and its feedback links with the SDGs suggests that it may be relevant to identify interactions between the SDGs and other socio-ecological realities and related research.

What Governs Tree Harvesting in Community Forestry—Regulatory Instruments or Forest Bureaucrats’ Discretion?

“…In 2012, the government issued a decree for green harvesting with restrictive provisions. According to this provision, the growing stock should be aligned within the threshold of a national average of 178 m 3 per ha and the harvested amount should be between 1 and 2 m 3 per ha irrespective of the forest condition (Table 1). This decision seemingly led to a reduction in tree harvesting quantity [21,22].…”

“…After the nationalization of forests in the 1950s, a sort of anarchy prevailed in the forestry sector in Nepal, which encouraged illegal logging, deforestation and forest encroachment, particularly in the Terai region [1]. The failure of nationalization of forests led to massive deforestation during the second half of the twentieth century and paved the way for community forestry in the country [2,3]. Under the concept of community forestry, the government transferred the responsibility for forest management to local communities through participatory forestry approaches [4].…”

Achieving sustainable development goals through participatory forest management: Examples from South‐Eastern Bangladesh

“…While forests received little attention in the millennium development goals, however, these are explicitly stated in SDG 15 (Life on Land) of agenda 2030, and SDG 15 is directly and indirectly related to the other 16 SDGs (Baumgartner, 2019; Bukoski, Drazen, Johnson, & Swamy, 2018; RECOFTC, 2016; Swamy, Drazen, Johnson, & Bukoski, 2018; World Wildlife Fund, 2018). Forests play an important role in reducing poverty, ensuring food security; human well‐being, water conservation, gender empowerment, rural energy source, sustainable economic growth, combating climate change, and promoting sustainable resource use and development (Bukoski et al, 2018; de Jong, Pokorny, Katila, Galloway, & Pacheco, 2018; Fern, 2016; Gratzer & Keeton, 2017; Tegegne, Cramm, Van Brusselen, & Linhares‐Juvenal, 2019).…”

Are community forests a viable model for the Democratic Republic of Congo?

“…They were therefore expected to play an important role in the common decision-making procedures and implementation of forestry activities. But in poor rural societies, such as in the forest zone of Cameroon, people's engagement in community forestry is motivated by their expectations of raising their standard of living (De Jong et al 2018). According to the sustainable livelihoods framework (Chambers andConway 1992, Scoones 1998), rural livelihoods are made of five types of assets, two of which focus on the material conditions of the communities:…”