We examined the effects of added nutrients on primary producers, protozoans and meiofauna -as well as on tufa deposition -in a short-term in situ experiment using nutrientdiffusing substrata. The study was carried out in the tufa-depositing barrage lake system National Park Plitvice Lakes (Croatia). To address the question of whether the extent of tufa deposition and the flow velocity modify the response of periphyton to nutrient addition, we selected 2 sites -fast flow (FF) and slow flow (SF) -on each of the 2 barriers, one barrier having a low rate of tufa deposition (LTD) and the other having a high rate of tufa deposition (HTD). The nutrients examined were nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and their combination (N+P). Both N and P were limiting nutrients for autotrophs in periphyton, and the response to nutrient enrichment was lower at HTD sites. A combination of HTD and FF was the most limiting factor for periphyton. Nutrient enrichment did not impede calcite deposition; P enrichment even enhanced calcite deposition -probably as a result of a denser autotrophic periphyton matrix. HTD supported a lower taxa richness of heterotrophs in the periphyton, and flow velocity had taxa-specific effects. The addition of nutrients led to a decrease in the number of heterotrophic taxa at FF sites, while there was no effect at SF sites. The response of ciliates to flow velocity was taxa-specific. The effect of nutrients on the abundance of heterotrophs was rather weak, except for omnivorous and bacterivorous ciliates. Our results showed a direct effect of N and P on autotrophic periphyton in this tufa-depositing system, and only a weak effect on protozoans and micro-metazoans.
KEY WORDS: Flow velocity · Chlorophyll a · Protozoa · Nutrient limitation
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherAquat Microb Ecol 65: [183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195] 2011 ( Andrushchyshyn et al. 2006). Bernhardt & Likens (2004) showed that eutrophication does not have an effect on the biomass of periphyton. To date, the effects of nutrient enrichment on protozoa have been examined in lakes (Hillebrand et al. 2002), rivers (Rublee & Partusch-Talley 1995) and streams (Domènech et al. 2006). While weak effects of nutrient enrichment on ciliate biomass were reported by Hillebrand et al. (2002), Rublee & Partusch-Talley (1995) ob served a significant increase in the abundance and biomass of heterotrophic microfauna after the addition of N+P, but no significant difference after the addition of P alone. Domènech et al. (2006) attributed an increase in ciliate density to the addition of N+P, whereas flagellates and testate amoebae were reported to be less sensitive to nutrient enrichment.Tufa develops under specific physico-chemical conditions as an ambient temperature freshwater carbonate deposit in which biological remains (particularly those of macrophyte stands) may comprise significant parts of deposited frameworks (Pedley 2000). Tufa formation is also responsible for i...