2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
77
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…aegypti, our data suggest that few households took long-term preventive action, or more specifically any action that would effectively control the vector. However, community responsiveness is multifaceted and complex, 12 and knowledge of the disease and vector may not be enough to stimulate a broad response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aegypti, our data suggest that few households took long-term preventive action, or more specifically any action that would effectively control the vector. However, community responsiveness is multifaceted and complex, 12 and knowledge of the disease and vector may not be enough to stimulate a broad response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it seems that the project has functioned as a health promotion intervention. Indeed, there are linkages between empowerment, social capital, and community health (Wagemakers et al 2010). Participatory or community approaches are a key element of health promotion, and the reasons why the citizen scientists liked to be part of the project resemble four important motivations for participation identified in effective community health promotion projects: Action that serves a tangible purpose; opportunities for selfdevelopment; recognition and status as a role model; and meaningful relationships (Fienieg et al 2012).…”
Section: Citizen Science and Health Promotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community participation is strongly advocated in health promotion, for example, the Ottawa Charter on health promotion emphasises "strengthening community action" as one of its core strands of action (World Health Organization 1986). Partnerships among researchers and community members are considered to be important opportunities for empowering communities to take action for better health (Minkler 2000, Israel et al 1998, Brown 1997, South and Phillips 2014, Wagemakers et al 2008, Wagemakers et al 2010, Horowitz et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other papers present data on these socioorganisational aspects, many readers may not read all the separate papers and may therefore interpret the conclusions of the effectiveness paper without the benefit of a comprehensive picture. Other studies have also reported a gap in information on how interventions bring about change in the social environment in favour of health (Anderson, Scrimshaw et al 2003;Metzler, Amuyunzu-Nyamongo et al 2007), and noted that a lot more happens through partnerships than is reported (Wagemakers, Vaandrager et al 2010). …”
Section: A Factors Contributing To the Effectiveness Of A Socio-techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the feedback from implementation research that was systematically used to guide the SolarMal implementation process and incorporate new learning likely played a key role in the effectiveness outcome. As others have noted, the estimation of the intervention impact on the outcome of interest alone will usually be insufficient (Kirkwood, Cousens et al 1997;Power, Langhaug et al 2004;Wagemakers, Vaandrager et al 2010), particularly in interventions such as SolarMal, which require the cooperation of people to be effective. Designing and developing an appropriate intervention requires a carefully planned feasibility assessment incorporating both formative and process assessments, with particular attention to the context of the proposed intervention (Power, Langhaug et al 2004).…”
Section: A Factors Contributing To the Effectiveness Of A Socio-techmentioning
confidence: 99%