2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community mapping of ecosystem services in tropical rainforest of Ecuador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3c, d and 4). Delgado-Aguilar et al (2017) noted that the high density of ecosystem service collection is often located close to main roads, and we also found that proximity to village centers influences the distribution. The "high" collection level for water resources was located within a distance of 2 km from village centers, and the collection level for materials was within 2-4 km from village centers.…”
Section: Spatial Characteristics Of Ecosystem Service Collectionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3c, d and 4). Delgado-Aguilar et al (2017) noted that the high density of ecosystem service collection is often located close to main roads, and we also found that proximity to village centers influences the distribution. The "high" collection level for water resources was located within a distance of 2 km from village centers, and the collection level for materials was within 2-4 km from village centers.…”
Section: Spatial Characteristics Of Ecosystem Service Collectionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In this context, we attempted to identify the specific ecosystem services utilized, their harvest seasons, and usage and clusters of collection through interviews. Furthermore, participatory mapping was carried out to obtain knowledge, perspectives, and needs of local people relying on ecosystem services that can be integrated into scientific research programs to develop sustainable management strategies (Brown 2004;Bryan et al 2010;Ramirez-Gomez et al 2015;Delgado-Aguilar et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conjunction with the establishment of "live fences" and implementation of the best management practices to transition Livestock-based LS into a more sustainable low-emission management systems, with potential enrolments in REDD+ programs [53] and a reduced-emission agricultural policy [86]; (c) The fact that crops contribute to more than 40% of income and are still largely part of the traditional "chakra" system, we recommend considering this aspect in the redirection of agricultural incentives in the EAR to reward the sustainable traditional agricultural system [55]. This is because chakra provides a plethora of ecosystem services [87] and is, characterized by having a high number of timber-yielding and fruit trees [48,51,56,57,75], edible and medicinal plants [51,54], leaf litter restoration and a minimization process of water erosion compared to monocultures and pastures [70]. Thus, the chakra system is an example of the use of sustainable production to combat biodiversity loss and climate change for small-scale farmers [48,49,51].…”
Section: Policy Implication For More Sustainable Production Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of previous CES studies examined stated preferences based on survey data (Gee and Burkhard, 2010;van Berkel and Verburg, 2014) and interviews (Plieninger et al, 2013). Individual surveys and interviews are advantageous as they encourage participation of the local stakeholders in a CES valuation (von Heland and Folke, 2014;Delgado-Aguilar et al, 2017). Also, participatory mapping such as public participation GIS (PPGIS) enhances public involvement in identifying spatially explicate information on CES provision (Brown and Fagerholm, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%