2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2013.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma: Factors associated with change in participation of children from the first to the second round

Abstract: Background Mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin is an important part of trachoma control programs. Maintaining high participation among children is challenging. Aim We assessed factors identifying households with a child who changed participation from the first MDA to the second MDA compared to households where all children participated at both MDAs. Methods Two case-control comparisons were conducted in 11 Tanzanian communities, which underwent MDA in 2008 and 2009. The first case group (n=165… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that children in households further from their primary water source were more likely to be PNT or EBA is probably indicative of some other unmeasured risk factor, for example, marginalisation within the community due to either household head or community leader choice, or a mixture of the two. Non-participation during MDA subsequent to participation in a previous MDA has been found to be associated with possible markers of marginalisation in another CRT [32]. Active trachoma has been found to be associated with lower socio-economic status (SES) and isolation of households from the community [33] so access to, or participation in, trachoma control activities could also be affected by these unmeasured factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that children in households further from their primary water source were more likely to be PNT or EBA is probably indicative of some other unmeasured risk factor, for example, marginalisation within the community due to either household head or community leader choice, or a mixture of the two. Non-participation during MDA subsequent to participation in a previous MDA has been found to be associated with possible markers of marginalisation in another CRT [32]. Active trachoma has been found to be associated with lower socio-economic status (SES) and isolation of households from the community [33] so access to, or participation in, trachoma control activities could also be affected by these unmeasured factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one MDA setting in Tanzania, households with persistent non-participation had a higher burden of familial responsibility and seemed less connected within the community (74). Households who dropped out of MDA after participating in one round were more likely to have a male CTA and also be less well connected within the village (75). The authors concluded that additional days of distribution and lessening CTAs' travel time to their assigned households may prevent nonparticipation, and were key to high coverage.…”
Section: Mass Drug Administration For Trachomamentioning
confidence: 99%