2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community N and O isotope fractionation by sulfide-dependent denitrification and anammox in a stratified lacustrine water column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While rates of nitrification were less sensitive (somewhat higher in the upper layers of 4A), this very low prescribed value of 15 ε DNF often lead to dramatically increased estimates of denitrification rates -in particular in the upper transitional layers of profiles at 2B and 3D where ∼ 10-20-fold higher maximum denitrification rates are required to reconcile nitrate concentration and isotope data ( In the anoxic intervals, estimated values of 18 ε : 15 ε DNF ranged from 0.83 to 1.11 with an average value of 0.99 ± 0.1 (Table 2), consistent with a prominent role of respiratory nitrate reductase (Nar), which imparts a 18 ε : 15 ε DNF of ∼ 0.96 ± 0.01 (Granger et al, 2008). Notably, however, the lower values of 0.86 and 0.83 observed near the top and the core of the anoxic zone in site 2B could suggest influence of nitrate reduction by periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap) (Granger et al, 2008) and chemolithotrophic NO − 3 reduction (Frey et al, 2014;Wenk et al, 2014), which has been shown to impart a lower 18 ε : 15 ε DNF closer to 0.6. In this particular interval, this could suggest that as much as 43 % of nitrate reduction is chemolithotrophic and perhaps metabolically linked to the oxidation of inorganic substrates such as reduced iron or sulfur species.…”
Section: Model Sensitivity To Prescribed 15 ε Dnf In Transitional Intsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While rates of nitrification were less sensitive (somewhat higher in the upper layers of 4A), this very low prescribed value of 15 ε DNF often lead to dramatically increased estimates of denitrification rates -in particular in the upper transitional layers of profiles at 2B and 3D where ∼ 10-20-fold higher maximum denitrification rates are required to reconcile nitrate concentration and isotope data ( In the anoxic intervals, estimated values of 18 ε : 15 ε DNF ranged from 0.83 to 1.11 with an average value of 0.99 ± 0.1 (Table 2), consistent with a prominent role of respiratory nitrate reductase (Nar), which imparts a 18 ε : 15 ε DNF of ∼ 0.96 ± 0.01 (Granger et al, 2008). Notably, however, the lower values of 0.86 and 0.83 observed near the top and the core of the anoxic zone in site 2B could suggest influence of nitrate reduction by periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap) (Granger et al, 2008) and chemolithotrophic NO − 3 reduction (Frey et al, 2014;Wenk et al, 2014), which has been shown to impart a lower 18 ε : 15 ε DNF closer to 0.6. In this particular interval, this could suggest that as much as 43 % of nitrate reduction is chemolithotrophic and perhaps metabolically linked to the oxidation of inorganic substrates such as reduced iron or sulfur species.…”
Section: Model Sensitivity To Prescribed 15 ε Dnf In Transitional Intsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Moreover, although the relationship between the kinetic isotope effects for 18 O and 15 N during respiratory consumption of NO − 3 by denitrification (e.g., 18 ε : 15 ε DNF ) has been shown to remain consistent at 1:1, the potential influence of nitrate reduction by periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap, periplasmic nitrate reductase. ), which imparts a lower 18 ε : 15 ε DNF value of 0.6 (Granger et al, 2008;Frey et al, 2014), could play a role in the dual isotope trajectory of NO − 3 consumption (Wenk et al, 2014). Further, in the absence of NH + 4 accumulation in these sediments, the δ 15 N NTR is equal to the source of NH + 4 being oxidized to NO − 3 , which is related to the δ 15 N of the organic matter being remineralized.…”
Section: Diffusion-reaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The nitrogen biogeochemistry of the recent years (2009–2011) in this lake basin has been investigated in detail (Wenk et al ), and sulfur‐driven denitrification was identified as the dominant fixed N removal process in the RTZ at mid water depth, whereas organotrophic denitrification seemed to be negligible. Denitrification in the RTZ, here defined as the zone between O 2 disappearance and H 2 S accumulation, led to a decrease in NO3 concentration from ∼30 μ mol L −1 at 20 m depth to zero levels within the RTZ (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, there is a lack of data on the isotopic expressions of these enzymes at the ecosystem level. Wenk et al (2014) attributed the low O : N isotopic effect of ∼ 0.89 to chemolithoautotrophic denitrification, rather than heterotrophic denitrification, in the northern basin of Lake Lugano.…”
Section: Denitrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%