2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41109-019-0126-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community structure in co-inventor networks affects time to first citation for patents

Abstract: We have investigated community structure in the co-inventor network of a given cohort of patents and related this structure to the dynamics of how these patents acquire their first citation. A statistically significant difference in the time lag until first citation is linked to whether or not this citation comes from a patent whose listed inventors share membership in the same communities as the inventors of the cited patent. Although the inventor-community structures identified by different community-detecti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in reference [ 9 ] believe that preprocessing plays an important role in the dynamic recommender structure. In this study, a similarity criterion to the clustering algorithm is added, which shows that the simulation results show that the similarity of the results is much better than the previous clustering criteria.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in reference [ 9 ] believe that preprocessing plays an important role in the dynamic recommender structure. In this study, a similarity criterion to the clustering algorithm is added, which shows that the simulation results show that the similarity of the results is much better than the previous clustering criteria.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between collaboration and innovation performance in various countries and regions as assessed through their patenting activity over the period from 1978 to 2019 with a particular focus on women inventors. According to the existing literature, patents are a key driver of innovation and provide a valuable measure of countries’/regions’ inventiveness [ 15 ] because innovations emerge from the complex collaborations and interactions that exist among a diverse set of inventors. Various studies have proven, using theoretical and empirical approaches, that there is a relationship between collaboration and innovation performance [ 17 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, patents must contain citations to other patents to acknowledge the state of the art. “These citations are understood to represent knowledge flows between inventors and have been widely used to study various economic and social aspects of innovation dynamics” [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some influential studies on smaller or more aggregated networks have been done in this field [167,168], and attempts to model and measure large-scale knowledge spreading phenomena on these collaboration networks are sure to follow. For example, one recent work [169] finds that the community structures in co-invention networks affect the timing of citations to new patents granted to inventors within these communities. That work illustrates the need for the application of more advanced network analysis tools than simple social distance approaches [167,168] to understand information diffusion in the co-invention network.…”
Section: Applications Of Network Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networks derived from patent metadata may also provide information about patent quality, and in particular, those derived the projections of bipartite networks [111,349] such as the co-invention network of inventors, the co-assignment network of firms, and the co-classification network of technology categories, in addition to the individual characteristics of these entities. The network location of these metadata in their respective networks may have a large part to play in informing both the nature of knowledge flow between people [74,169] and the effect of unique combinations of expertise or technologies [209]. An interesting piece of work in this vein is the recent study of Morgan et al [350], the results of which highlight the institutional inequalities inherent in the diffusion of scientific knowledge.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Additional Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%