“…First, the inclusion of other relevant correlates of public responses to cases of IPVAW would help to further understand the processes involved in decision making leading to different types of responses to incidents of IPVAW. The inclusion of other possible predictors of public responses to IPVAW such as the influence of emotional factors, attitudes towards family privacy, victim-blaming attitudes, trust in the authorities' effectiveness, perception of the support available to victims, or contextual effects such as neighborhood social disorder would also help to better understand public responses to incidents of IPVAW (Christy & Voigt, 1994;Gracia & Herrero, 2007;Gracia, Herrero, Lila, & Fuente, 2009;Hadeed & El-Bassel, 2006;James, Johnson, & Raghavan, 2004;Levine, 1999;Raghavan, Mennerich, Sexton, & James, 2006;Weiner, 1980). Another potential limitation is that we used hypothetical scenarios as a stimulus rather than actual situations, and it is possible that public responses might differ from what they actually would do in a real situation (Fritzsche, Finkelstein, & Penner, 2000;Robinson & Chandek, 2000).…”